Literature DB >> 4049204

Routine operative cholangiography.

J L Mills, D E Beck, F J Harford.   

Abstract

The records of 300 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy at a large military teaching hospital from January 1981 through August 1982 were reviewed; 270 patients (90 per cent) had intraoperative cholangiograms. Four clinical indications were helpful in predicting the likelihood of a positive intraoperative cholangiogram: 1, jaundice; 2, pancreatitis; 3, dilated common bile duct, and 4, palpable stones. The 63 patients with at least one of these indications had a 35 per cent incidence of true positive cholangiograms, while the 207 patients without such indications had a 0.5 per cent incidence of true positive studies (p less than 0.01). The incidence of false-positive studies was 0.7 per cent in our series and 3.1 per cent in our review of the literature of 2,580 cholangiograms. We conclude that cholangiography in the absence of clinical indications has a low yield. If cholangiography had been used selectively during the time period of 20 months of our retrospective study, more than 25,000 dollars could have been saved without missing significant pathologic findings in the common bile duct. We conclude that the thoughtful surgeon should perform cholangiography on a selective rather than routine basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4049204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  10 in total

1.  Selective cholangiography. Current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; B H Wang; H A Pitt; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A comparison of intraoperative ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Barteau; D Castro; M E Arregui; C Tetik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz; H Rutten; P J Jürgens; E J Carol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  J D Corbitt; S O Yusem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Wu; Feng-Chi Chen; Chong-Jeh Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Gallstone cholangitis: a 10-year experience of combined endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment.

Authors:  L Sarli; D Iusco; G Sgobba; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessment of the common bile duct before cholecystectomy using ultrasound and biochemical measurements: validation based on follow-up.

Authors:  D S Watkin; J M Haworth; D J Leaper; M H Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  The Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Approach without the Intraopertative Cholangiography Use: A Retrospective Study on 750 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Kemal Atahan; Serhat Gur; Evren Durak; Atilla Cokmez; Ercument Tarcan
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2012-07-20

9.  The Routine Use of Cholangiography for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Evangelos S Photi; Ahmed El-Hadi; Stephanie Brown; Leyla Swafe; Sarah Ashford-Wilson; Jennifer Barwell; Imogen Koopmans; Michael P N Lewis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  One thousand and six consecutive laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiograms.

Authors:  J D Corbitt; L A Leonetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.