Literature DB >> 4049093

Quantitative assessment of the fifth lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography in symptomatic L4-L5 disc disease.

M Kornberg, G R Rechtine.   

Abstract

Interpedicular distance, interfacet distance, midsagittal diameter, and cross-sectional area at the upper aspect of the fifth lumbar spinal canal were measured from the computed tomographic (CT) scans of the spine performed in a period of 1 year. The patients were divided into four groups. Group I (25 patients) was the normal control group. Group II comprised 29 symptomatic patients who were thought to have an L4-L5 herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) by CT and did not undergo surgery. Group IIIA was made up of 24 patients who underwent an L4-L5 discectomy and had favorable results, and Group IIIB (3 patients) included those who failed to improve following surgery. The symptomatic patient with an L4-L5 HNP by CT who did not undergo operative treatment had a mean canal size as measured by midsagittal diameter and cross-sectional area that was smaller (P less than 0.05) than in a normal control group. In the patients who required an L4-L5 discectomy, these same measurements were smaller (P less than 0.001) when compared with the nonoperative group. In the three failure patients, all four measurements were significantly smaller than in patients in Group IIIA with the interfacet distance and the cross-sectional area differences being the greatest (P less than 0.001). The patients who are likely to undergo operative treatment have a midsagittal diameter that is less than 1.6 cm and a cross-sectional area that is less than 2.5 cm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4049093     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198505000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Does the anteroposterior diameter of the bony spinal canal reflect its size? An anatomical study.

Authors:  R Gepstein; Y Folman; P Sagiv; Y Ben David; T Hallel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Lumbar spinal canal morphometry from computed tomography scans: reproducibility, results and clinical implications.

Authors:  C G Greenough; R D Fraser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

5.  Ultrasound lumbar canal measurement in hospital employees with back pain.

Authors:  D J Anderson; D F Adcock; A C Chovil; J J Farrell
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-08

6.  Spinal canal dimensions affect outcome of adolescent disc herniation.

Authors:  O Linkoaho; R Kivisaari; M Ahonen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.