Literature DB >> 4044187

The development of radiologic schemata through training and experience. A preliminary communication.

A Hillard, M Myles-Worsley, W Johnston, B Baxter.   

Abstract

Research underway in our laboratory suggests that radiologists may develop a visual representation of a prototypical radiograph (a schema) in the course of clinical training. This schema appears to guide radiologists' interpretations of chest radiographs. Cognitive psychologists have demonstrated schematic processing for familiar events or scenes. In our experiments, experienced radiologists (18.5 years average experience), junior staff radiologists (3.5 years), and first-year radiology residents participated in a simple recognition/memory test of chest radiographs. The test phase followed a training phase in which each radiograph was viewed for 500 milliseconds. Both abnormal and normal chest radiographs were used. Correct responses were recorded during the test phase for measuring recognition memory. Residents showed no significant difference in memory between normal and abnormal films. Observers with greater radiologic experience exhibited poorer memory for normal films and better memory for abnormal films compared with less experienced observers. We hypothesize that the development of radiographic schemata as a result of experience accounts for these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4044187     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198507000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  5 in total

1.  Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they?

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Edith M Marom; Myrna C B Godoy; Diana Palacio; Tara Sagebiel; Sonia Betancourt Cuellar; Mark McEntee; Charles Tian; Patrick C Brennan; Tamara Miner Haygood
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-03

2.  Consistency of response and image recognition, pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  T M Haygood; M A Q Liu; E Galvan; R Bassett; W A Murphy; C S Ng; A Matamoros; E M Marom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Memory bias in observer-performance literature.

Authors:  Tamara Miner Haygood; Samantha Smith; Jia Sun
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-24

4.  How massed practice improves visual expertise in reading panoramic radiographs in dental students: An eye tracking study.

Authors:  Juliane Richter; Katharina Scheiter; Thérése Felicitas Eder; Fabian Huettig; Constanze Keutel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.