Literature DB >> 4043312

Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection.

S J Arnold.   

Abstract

Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection have disproven some of the central tenets of both the handicap mechanism and the 'sexy son' hypothesis. These results suggest that the 'good genes' approach to sexual selection may generally lead to erroneous results. Runaway sexual selection seems possible under a wide variety of circumstances. Quantitative genetic models have revealed runaway processes for sexually selected attributes expressed in both sexes and for attributes of parental care. Furthermore, the runaway could occur simultaneously in a series of populations that straddle an environmental gradient. While the models support the feasibility of runaway processes, empirical studies are needed to evaluate whether runaways actually happen. Estimates of critical genetic parameters are particularly needed, as well as measures of natural and sexual selection acting on the same population. The models also show that sexual selection has tremendous potential to produce population differentiation, particularly in epigamic traits. Differentiation is promoted by indeterminancy of evolutionary outcome, transient differences among populations during the final slow approach to equilibrium, sampling drift among equilibrium populations, and the tendency of sexual selection to amplify geographic variation arising from spatial differences in natural selection. Recent work with two- and three-locus models of sexual selection has produced results that parallel the results of the polygenic models. Thus the feature of indeterminate equilibria (outcome dependent on initial conditions) is common to both types of model.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4043312     DOI: 10.1007/bf01952072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Experientia        ISSN: 0014-4754


  29 in total

1.  The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1977-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE IN SEXUAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  A STATISTICAL STUDY OF MATE CHOICE: SEXUAL SELECTION IN A PLETHODONTID SALAMANDER (DESMOGNATHUS OCHROPHAEUS).

Authors:  Lynne D Houck; Stevan J Arnold; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  The adaptive significance of sexuality.

Authors:  H J Bremermann
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1985-10-15

10.  Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle.

Authors:  M Turelli
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire.

Authors:  L M Meffert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea: inherited mating preference?

Authors:  A J Moore
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale-line approach.

Authors:  Jean R David; Patricia Gibert; Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Hélène Legout; Georges Pétavy; Catherine Beaumont; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Estimating selection on the act of inbreeding in a population with strong inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Eva Troianou; Jisca Huisman; Josephine M Pemberton; Craig A Walling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.