Literature DB >> 4041952

Epidural fentanyl, with and without epinephrine for post-Caesarean section analgesia.

K Robertson, M J Douglas, G H McMorland.   

Abstract

Using a double-bolus technique, the efficacy and safety of epidural fentanyl with and without epinephrine 1:400,000 for post-Caesarean section analgesia was examined in 30 patients. The addition of 25 micrograms epinephrine to the fentanyl (100 micrograms) did not potentiate the speed of onset but did significantly prolong the duration of action of the second dose. The only side effect encountered was pruritus, which was significantly increased (from 17-44 per cent) when epinephrine was added. The results indicate a clinical advantage of prolonging the duration of action of fentanyl for post-Caesarean Section analgesia with the addition of epinephrine, but the cumbersome and time-consuming nature of a double-bolus technique limits its clinical value. The relative safety of epidural fentanyl with and without epinephrine was confirmed by the absence of respiratory depression, drowsiness or hypotension in all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4041952     DOI: 10.1007/bf03010800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  7 in total

1.  Selective epidural analgesia.

Authors:  M J Wolfe; A D Nicholas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Edgar E Ohnhaus; Rolf Adler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The optimum concentration for epidural fentanyl. A randomised, double-blind comparison with and without 1:200 000 adrenaline.

Authors:  E A Welchew
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Epinephrine and epidural narcotics.

Authors:  C Collier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Influence of epinephrine as an adjuvant to epidural morphine.

Authors:  P R Bromage; E M Camporesi; P A Durant; C H Nielsen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Analgesic action of extradural fentanyl.

Authors:  M J Wolfe; G K Davies
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its newer derivatives.

Authors:  L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Update on obstetrical anaesthesia.

Authors:  D Biehl; R J Palahniuk
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-03

2.  Epidural sufentanil for post-caesarean section analgesia: lack of benefit of epinephrine.

Authors:  G H McMorland; M J Douglas; J H Kim; A A Kamani; J E Swenerton; J Berkowitz; P L Ross; L Palmer; D M Ansley
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia.

Authors:  P Y Yu; D R Gambling
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.