Literature DB >> 4036969

An interdisciplinary method of classifying and monitoring medication errors.

R P Betz, H B Levy.   

Abstract

A system is described for reporting medication errors according to practitioner and type and using these data as part of a departmental quality-assessment program. Types of errors committed in prescribing, in dispensing, and in administering drugs in a teaching hospital were listed. Prescribers' and pharmacists' reports of errors committed. Data on dispensing errors by 16 staff pharmacists were collected over a 12-month period in 1982-83, and data on prescribing by resident physicians were collected during three separate one-month periods. For each pharmacist, data on dispensing errors were compiled monthly. Pharmacists were counseled if they had a large number of errors in one category, a high total number of errors, or a substantial number of errors in a single category over several months. Likewise, physicians who committed more errors than their department's mean were counseled by the clinical chairman. After 12 months, each pharmacist's monthly error rate was compared with the departmental average. The number of dispensing errors reported during the study period (average 60.7 per month for the department) was lower than expected. Serious prescribing errors were minimal. In spite of probable underreporting of errors in this voluntary system, these methods of classifying medication errors by type and practitioner group and of recording error rates were useful tools for monitoring and improving performance of pharmacists and prescribers.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4036969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  12 in total

1.  Accidental iatrogenic intoxications by cytotoxic drugs: error analysis and practical preventive strategies.

Authors:  B Zernikow; E Michel; G Fleischhack; U Bode
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  What is a prescribing error?

Authors:  B Dean; N Barber; M Schachter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

3.  Evaluating the impact of information technology on medication errors: a simulation.

Authors:  James G Anderson; Stephen J Jay; Marilyn Anderson; Thaddeus J Hunt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Evaluating the capability of information technology to prevent adverse drug events: a computer simulation approach.

Authors:  James G Anderson; Stephen J Jay; Marilyn Anderson; Thaddeus J Hunt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  The incidence of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: an overview of the research methods.

Authors:  Bryony Dean Franklin; Charles Vincent; Mike Schachter; Nick Barber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Clarification of terminology in medication errors: definitions and classification.

Authors:  Robin E Ferner; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  The frequency and potential causes of dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy.

Authors:  Adnan Beso; Bryony Dean Franklin; Nick Barber
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06

8.  Evaluating the potential effectiveness of using computerized information systems to prevent adverse drug events.

Authors:  J G Anderson; S J Jay; M Anderson; T J Hunt
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

9.  Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events.

Authors:  D W Bates; D L Boyle; M B Vander Vliet; J Schneider; L Leape
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Factors contributing to medication errors in Jordan: a nursing perspective.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Shara
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.