Literature DB >> 4032272

Bioequivalence of carbamazepine chewable and conventional tablets: single-dose and steady-state studies.

K K Chan, R J Sawchuk, T A Thompson, E Redalieu, W E Wagner, A R LeSher, B J Weeks, N R Hall, A Gerardin.   

Abstract

Single-dose and steady-state studies were carried out on separate occasions to examine the bioequivalence of the newly formulated carbamazepine chewable tablet. In the single-dose study, the plasma levels resulting from 2 X 200-mg conventional tablets (CT), 4 X 100-mg chewable tablets swallowed whole (SW), and 4 X 100-mg chewable tablets chewed before swallowing (CHEW) were compared. A randomized 3 X 3 Latin-square design balanced for residual effects, with a 3-week washout period, was used (n = 6). Plasma samples were analyzed by a specific GC method for carbamazepine. The following parameters were used for evaluation: AUC, Cmax, tmax, and t1/2. None of the parameters were significantly different except Cmax and t1/2 values for CHEW and CT. The Cmax was 25% higher and t1/2 was 11% shorter for CHEW than CT. The impact of differences in the peak plasma levels at steady state were examined by pharmacokinetic projection (400 mg b.i.d.) based on the single-dose data and with simulated induction equal to a 50% reduction in t1/2. The projected steady-state CT and CHEW plasma concentrations were similar, with a difference of only 4%. The results demonstrate the bioequivalence of the dosage forms with respect to the extent of absorption, and similar steady-state concentrations of carbamazepine in plasma can be expected. To test the conclusion from the projected study, a separate bioequivalence study to compare CHEW relative to CT was performed at steady state in normal volunteers (200 mg b.i.d.).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4032272     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600740813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  6 in total

1.  Computer analysis of saccadic eye movements: assessment of two different carbamazepine formulations.

Authors:  G Tedeschi; G Casucci; S Allocca; R Riva; A Di Costanzo; A Quattrone; A Baruzzi; V Bonavita
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A comparative pharmacokinetic study of conventional and chewable carbamazepine in epileptic patients.

Authors:  P N Patsalos
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Relationship between systemic drug absorption and gastrointestinal transit after the simultaneous oral administration of carbamazepine as a controlled-release system and as a suspension of 15N-labelled drug to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  I R Wilding; S S Davis; J G Hardy; C S Robertson; V A John; M L Powell; M Leal; P Lloyd; S M Walker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine. Part I: A new bioequivalency parameter based on a relative bioavailability trial.

Authors:  A Kayali; I Tuğlular; M Ertaş
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Investigating Oral Absorption of Carbamazepine in Pediatric Populations.

Authors:  Philip Kohlmann; Cordula Stillhart; Martin Kuentz; Neil Parrott
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Effect of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Inducers on Exposure of P-gp Substrates: Review of Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction Studies.

Authors:  Mohamed Elmeliegy; Manoli Vourvahis; Cen Guo; Diane D Wang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.