Literature DB >> 4032019

Somatosensory evoked potentials evaluated in normal subjects and spinal cord-injured patients.

R Chabot, D H York, C Watts, W A Waugh.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked cortical potentials (SSEP's) were recorded in 27 healthy subjects using tibial and peroneal nerve stimulation with cephalic and non-cephalic references. Four major peaks were present in all recordings. Analysis of these components showed that SSEP's collected after tibial nerve stimulation with non-cephalic reference (linked earlobes) produced the most consistent clearly defined component peaks. Average latency, amplitude, and interpeak latency differences are presented for these SSEP's. Significant correlations were obtained between the height of the individual and the P1, N2, P2, and N3 latencies, and the N3-P1 interpeak latency. These results suggest that reproducible SSEP's can be obtained from tibial nerve stimulation in normal subjects using minimal numbers of stimulus presentations (28 to 64). The SSEP's from 34 patients with varying degrees of spinal cord trauma were compared with the SSEP's from normal subjects. These comparisons involved the P1, N2, P2, and N3 latencies and the interpeak latency values, as well as the amplitude values. Patients with normal sensory and motor neurological examinations could be distinguished from patients showing decreased sensory and motor findings or clinically complete lesions on the basis of peak latency and interpeak latency values. The latter two groups could not be distinguished from one another. In general, all patient groups had SSEP's of lower amplitude than did normal individuals, but the groups could not be distinguished from one another. These results indicate that SSEP's can be a useful clinical tool for differentiation of complete from incomplete spinal cord lesions, but do not invariably predict recovery of function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4032019     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.4.0544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  Motor versus somatosensory evoked potential changes after acute experimental spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  M Zileli; J Schramm
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Changes of functional outcomes according to the degree of completeness of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hyo Sang Kim; Hyung Jun Jeong; Myeong Ok Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 3.  Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Phase-dependent deficits during reach-to-grasp after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Does intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring have predictive value for functional recovery following spinal cord injury? A case report.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; Christopher J Martin; Anthony Lapinsky; Patrick J Connolly; Christian Dipaola
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.