Literature DB >> 4031257

Transformation of sound-pressure level from the free field to the eardrum presented in numerical form.

E A Shaw, M M Vaillancourt.   

Abstract

In an earlier work [E. A. G. Shaw, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56, 1848-1861 (1974)], self-consistent families of curves which best fitted the experimental data from 12 studies were presented to show the average sound-pressure transformation from the free field to the human eardrum in the horizontal plane. Tabulated values of azimuthal dependence at 15-deg intervals in azimuth and transformation to the eardrum at 0 degree azimuth are given at 43 selected frequencies between 0.2 and 12 kHz. These values are self-consistent within 0.1 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4031257     DOI: 10.1121/1.393035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The madsen aurical.

Authors:  J E Baer; J Groth
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-12

3.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Discrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape.

Authors:  Daniel E Shub; Suzanne P Carr; Yunmi Kong; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Real ear unaided gain and its relation with the equivalent volume of the external and middle ear.

Authors:  Bárbara Guimarães Bastos; Deborah Viviane Ferrari; Wanderléia Quinhoneiro Blasc
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07

6.  Simultaneous Assessment of Speech Identification and Spatial Discrimination: A Potential Testing Approach for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Naomi Elliott; Katherine C Wood; Deborah A Vickers
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Adapting Hearing Devices to the Individual Ear Acoustics: Database and Target Response Correction Functions for Various Device Styles.

Authors:  Florian Denk; Stephan M A Ernst; Stephan D Ewert; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Validation of methods for prediction of clinical output levels of active middle ear implants from measurements in human cadaveric ears.

Authors:  Martin Grossöhmichen; Bernd Waldmann; Rolf Salcher; Nils Prenzler; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners With Impaired Hearing Employing FADE.

Authors:  Marc R Schädler; David Hülsmeier; Anna Warzybok; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.