Literature DB >> 4031120

Trigeminocerebellar, trigeminotectal, and trigeminothalamic projections: a double retrograde axonal tracing study in the mouse.

D A Steindler.   

Abstract

Double retrograde axonal tracing experiments were carried out in order to reveal potential patterns of divergence in axonal projections from the two major sensory nuclei of the mouse brainstem trigeminal complex: the principal sensory and spinal trigeminal nuclei (oralis, interpolaris, and caudalis divisions). The tracers wheat germ agglutinin, N-[acetyl-3H] and horseradish peroxidase were used in paired injection strategies within portions of the cerebellum, superior colliculus, and thalamic ventrobasal complex and/or posterior group of adult ICR white mice. Trigeminal neurons with projections to tactile areas of the cerebellar cortex or underlying deep cerebellar nuclei were found scattered throughout the principal sensory nucleus and interpolaris division, and mainly in dorsal regions of the oralis division of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Injections of either tracer which involved lateral portions of the rostral half of the superior colliculus labeled trigeminotectal neurons mainly in the contralateral interpolaris division, ventral half of the oralis division, and a ventral region of the principal sensory nucleus near the oralis border. Fewer trigeminotectal neurons were found scattered throughout the principal sensory nucleus and the magnocellular layer of the caudalis divisions, although an occasional labeled neuron wa also found in the marginal layer. Contralaterally projecting trigeminothalamic neurons were observed throughout the principal sensory nucleus, interpolaris division, and within the marginal and magnocellular layers of caudalis. Double-labeled neurons were observed only after paired injections of the tracers in the thalamus and ipsilateral superior colliculus, and they were found within the caudoventral portion of the principal sensory nucleus near the oralis border, throughout the interpolaris division, within the magnocellular layer of caudalis, and only a few double-labeled neurons were also found within the marginal layer. After such injections, 50% of the labeled tectum-projecting neurons in the principal sensory nucleus, 64% in the interpolaris division, and 57% in the caudalis division are branched neurons which have collateralized projections to both the superior colliculus and thalamus. These projections, which have not been described before, appear to arise from more than one class of projection neuron which is differentially distributed within different regions of the trigeminus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4031120     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902370203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  16 in total

1.  Tactile responses in the granule cell layer of cerebellar folium crus IIa of freely behaving rats.

Authors:  M J Hartmann; J M Bower
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Integration in trigeminal premotor interneurones in the cat. 1. Functional characteristics of neurones in the subnucleus-gamma of the oral nucleus of the spinal trigeminal tract.

Authors:  K G Westberg; K A Olsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Stellate neurons mediate functional hyperemia in the cerebellar molecular layer.

Authors:  G Yang; J M Huard; A J Beitz; M E Ross; C Iadecola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cerebellar nuclear afferents--where do they originate? A re-evaluation of the projections from some lower brain stem nuclei.

Authors:  E Dietrichs; F Walberg
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1987

5.  Hypothalamic control of nocireceptive and other neurons in the marginal layer of the dorsal horn of the medulla (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) in the rat.

Authors:  S S Mokha; G E Goldsmith; R F Hellon; R Puri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The trigeminal pathways.

Authors:  Louis-Marie Terrier; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Christophe Destrieux
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Gi protein functions in thalamic neurons to decrease orofacial nociceptive response.

Authors:  Jennifer Strand; Crystal Stinson; Larry L Bellinger; Yuan Peng; Phillip R Kramer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Human cerebellar responses to brush and heat stimuli in healthy and neuropathic pain subjects.

Authors:  D Borsook; E A Moulton; S Tully; J D Schmahmann; L Becerra
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Organization of feedback and feedforward projections of the barrel cortex: a PHA-L study in the mouse.

Authors:  E Welker; P V Hoogland; H Van der Loos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Anatomical pathways involved in generating and sensing rhythmic whisker movements.

Authors:  Laurens W J Bosman; Arthur R Houweling; Cullen B Owens; Nouk Tanke; Olesya T Shevchouk; Negah Rahmati; Wouter H T Teunissen; Chiheng Ju; Wei Gong; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.