Literature DB >> 4029402

The health of rectal cancer patients in the community.

L D MacDonald, H R Anderson.   

Abstract

Surviving rectal cancer patients living in five health districts were identified through cancer registrations. Four hundred and twenty (91%) were interviewed at home by health visitors to assess their physical, social and psychological health. In most respects, the health of rectal cancer patients overall was similar to that of the general population of the same age, sex and social circumstances. However, those with a colostomy (63%) were more likely to be severely depressed, socially isolated and stigmatized. They also suffered more from physical problems, particularly urinary symptoms, flatus and offensive bowel motions. The pressure of a colostomy was associated with reduced sexual capacity, though not with lack of sexual interest. The results confirm the high psychological and social costs of a permanent colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4029402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Stigma, perceived blame, self-blame, and depressive symptoms in men with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Phelan; Joan M Griffin; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Wendy Hellerstedt; Mandy Stahre; David Nelson; Leah L Zullig; Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Authors:  Jørn Pachler; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

3.  Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma.

Authors:  Lone Ross; Annemette G Abild-Nielsen; Birthe L Thomsen; Randi V Karlsen; Ellen H Boesen; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Grumann; E M Noack; I A Hoffmann; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection has similar long-term oncological outcomes to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Zhi-Hang Liu; Zi-Wei Zeng; Hai-Qing Jie; Liang Huang; Shuang-Ling Luo; Wen-Feng Liang; Xing-Wei Zhang; Liang Kang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 6.  Psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: a review.

Authors:  M J Bekkers; F C van Knippenberg; H W van den Borne; H Poen; J Bergsma; G P vanBergeHenegouwen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1995-02

7.  [Quality of life after rectal surgery].

Authors:  S Hoppe De Mamani; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  A S Allal; S Bieri; A Pelloni; V Spataro; S Anchisi; P Ambrosetti; M A Sprangers; J M Kurtz; P Gertsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparison of Anthropometric Parameters after Ultralow Anterior Resection and Abdominoperineal Resection in Very Low-Lying Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Jun Woo Bong; Seok-Byung Lim; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.