Literature DB >> 4029234

A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children.

D M Griffiths, J D Atwell, N V Freeman.   

Abstract

Both the British Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that circumcision should only be performed for medical reasons. No one has ever described which reasons are actually used, nor measured the morbidity of the procedure. Of 140 boys coming to day-case elective circumcision between the ages of 3 months and 14 years (mean 4.3 years), the commonest cause was a congenital phimosis (42.8%). Four (2.8%) patients required acute readmission postoperatively, and a further 4 developed meatal stenosis, requiring a formal meatotomy. Of 99 patients followed up in detail, 46% vomited, 36% oozed, 19% did not pass urine for more than 12 h and 26% could not wear pants for more than 7 days. Childhood circumcision has an appreciable morbidity, and should not be recommended without a medical reason.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4029234     DOI: 10.1159/000472487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  10 in total

Review 1.  Are general paediatric surgery outcomes comparable between district general hospital and regional referral centres?

Authors:  M C Hart Prieto; P A Jones
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Paediatric sutureless circumcision--an alternative to the standard technique.

Authors:  Brian D Kelly; Dara J Lundon; Marie E Timlin; Mazhar Sheikh; Nadeem B Nusrat; Frank T D'Arcy; Syed Q Jaffry
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Should religious circumcisions be performed on the NHS.

Authors:  P Madden; S A Boddy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

4.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Saving the normal foreskin.

Authors:  P Cuckow; P Mouriquand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-13

Review 6.  Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies.

Authors:  D Singh-Grewal; J Macdessi; J Craig
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The advantages of cyanoacrylate wound closure in circumcision.

Authors:  Levent Elemen; Tulay Hosten Seyidov; Melih Tugay
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Weiss; Natasha Larke; Daniel Halperin; Inon Schenker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  A fast, easy circumcision procedure combining a CO2 laser and cyanoacrylate adhesive: a non-randomized comparative trial.

Authors:  Tahsin Gorgulu; Abdulkerim Olgun; Merve Torun; Eksal Kargi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.