Literature DB >> 4028631

Lack of interaction between verapamil and cimetidine.

D R Abernethy, J B Schwartz, E L Todd.   

Abstract

Nine healthy normal subjects received verapamil, 10 mg iv, before (control) and during cimetidine dosing (300 mg every 6 hours), and verapamil, 120 mg po, twice in the same manner. After intravenous doses, the t1/2 (means +/- SE: control, 3.60 +/- 0.40 hours; cimetidine trial, 4.30 +/- 0.60 hours), volume of distribution (5.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.9 L/kg), and total clearance (19.2 +/- 1.5 vs. 18.4 +/- 1.6 ml/min/kg) did not change during cimetidine dosing. After oral doses, the t1/2 (4.25 +/- 0.57 vs. 4.60 +/- 0.70 hours), plasma AUC (585 +/- 113 vs. 506 +/- 82 ng/ml X hr) and absolute bioavailability (35% +/- 7% vs. 30% +/- 5%) did not differ between control and cimetidine trials, respectively. Five of the subjects also received lidocaine, 25 mg iv, once in the control state and once during the cimetidine regimen described above. Lidocaine clearance fell (665 +/- 216 vs. 527 +/- 134 ml/min; P less than 0.05) during cimetidine therapy, resulting in a trend toward a longer t1/2 (1.81 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.44 +/- 0.42 hours; 0.1 greater than P greater than 0.05) with no change in volume of distribution (1.77 +/- 0.66 vs. 1.99 +/- 0.81 L/kg). Verapamil pharmacodynamics (ECG PR interval, blood pressure, and heart rate) were evaluated after intravenous doses. A decrease in mean arterial pressure (8 +/- 1 vs. 9 +/- 2 mm Hg) and a reflex increase in heart rate (14 +/- 3 vs. 17 +/- 2 bpm) were no different in the control and cimetidine trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4028631     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1985.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinical relevance of cimetidine drug interactions.

Authors:  A F Shinn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Comparison of information on the pharmacokinetic interactions of Ca antagonists in the package inserts from three countries (Japan, USA and UK).

Authors:  Mitsuo Saito; Mutsuko Hirata-Koizumi; Shinji Miyake; Ryuichi Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Part II).

Authors:  K Lauritsen; L S Laursen; J Rask-Madsen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Influence of famotidine on verapamil pharmacokinetics in rats.

Authors:  Kamal M Matar
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 5.  Calcium antagonists. Drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  T Rosenthal; D Ezra
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Calcium antagonists in the elderly. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  J B Schwartz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem.

Authors:  H Echizen; M Eichelbaum
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic interactions of cimetidine 1987.

Authors:  A Somogyi; M Muirhead
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.