Literature DB >> 4027566

The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts.

B E Shapiro, M Danly.   

Abstract

Sixteen right-handed adult males with localized insult to either the right or left hemisphere and five control subjects without brain damage read aloud target sentences embedded in paragraphs, while intoning their voices in either a declarative, interrogative, happy, or sad mode. Acoustical analysis of the speech wave was performed. Right-anterior (pre-Rolandic) and right-central (pre- and post-Rolandic) brain-damaged patients spoke with less pitch variation and restricted intonational range across emotional and nonemotional domains, while patients with right posterior (post-Rolandic) damage had exaggerated pitch variation and intonational range across both domains. No such deficits were found in patients with left posterior damage, whose prosody was similar to that of normal control subjects. It is suggested that damage to the right hemisphere alone may result in a primary disturbance of speech prosody that may be independent of the disturbances in affect often noted in right-brain-damaged populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4027566     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(85)90118-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  13 in total

1.  Question/statement judgments: an fMRI study of intonation processing.

Authors:  Colin P Doherty; W Caroline West; Laura C Dilley; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel; David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Psychopathological aspects and emotional behavior in right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  A Craca; M Del Prete; P Fiore; G Balestroni; G Megna
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1990-10

3.  The memory that's right and the memory that's left: event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information.

Authors:  Karen M Evans; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  A possible functional localizer for identifying brain regions sensitive to sentence-level prosody.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Po-Jang Hsieh; Zuzanna Balewski
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  The role of fundamental frequency in signaling linguistic stress and affect: evidence for a dissociation.

Authors:  G W McRoberts; M Studdert-Kennedy; D P Shankweiler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

6.  The relationship between co-speech gesture production and macrolinguistic discourse abilities in people with focal brain injury.

Authors:  Seda Akbıyık; Ayşenur Karaduman; Tilbe Göksun; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Face-to-Face Light Detection Paradigm: A New Methodology for Investigating Visuospatial Attention Across Different Face Regions in Live Face-to-Face Communication Settings.

Authors:  Laura A Thompson; Daniel M Malloy; John M Cone; David L Hendrickson
Journal:  Interact Stud       Date:  2010-01-01

8.  Affective prosody in the reading voice of stroke patients.

Authors:  A House; D Rowe; P J Standen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Hemispheric differences and similarities in comprehending more and less predictable sentences.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Lateralization of visuospatial attention across face regions varies with emotional prosody.

Authors:  Laura A Thompson; Daniel M Malloy; Katya L LeBlanc
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.