Literature DB >> 4025886

The effect of high dose sodium thiopental on brain stem auditory and median nerve somatosensory evoked responses in humans.

J C Drummond, M M Todd, H S U.   

Abstract

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (MnSSEPs), brain stem auditory evoked responses (BAERs), and the cortical electro-encephalogram (EEG) were recorded in six patients during a 62-min infusion of sodium thiopental (STP) at a rate of 1.25 mg X kg-1 X min-1 (total dose, 77.5 mg/kg). The EEG became isoelectric after 22 +/- 8 (SD) min of STP infusion. Dose-related changes in the latencies and amplitudes of various evoked response wave forms were observed. However, in no instance was any component of either the MnSSEP or the BAER rendered unobtainable by STP administration. For the MnSSEP, progressive increases in the central conduction time (5.33 +/- 0.41 ms preinduction vs. 7.46 +/- 1.2 ms at t = 60 min) and in the latency of the cortical primary specific complex were observed simultaneously with significant reductions in the amplitude of the latter (2.10 +/- 0.85 muV preinduction vs. 0.85 +/- 0.55 muV at t = 60 min). Changes in the latency and amplitude of the response recorded over the upper cervical spine (C2) were not statistically significant in this small population. For the BAER, progressive and significant increases in the latencies of Waves I, III, V (e.g., Wave V latency: 6.16 +/- 0.24 vs. 6.87 +/- 0.31 ms) and in the I-III, III-V, and the I-V interwave latencies were observed. The amplitudes of the BAER components were not significantly altered. The authors conclude that the administration of a dose of STP in excess of twice that required to produce EEG isoelectricity can be compatible with effective monitoring of MnSSEPs and BAERs. However, STP produces dose-related changes in both evoked response wave forms, which must be considered in the interpretation of responses elicited during STP anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4025886     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198509000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Do evoked potentials have any value in anaesthesia?

Authors:  A M Lam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials during procaine toxicity in dogs.

Authors:  Z N Ding; Y Yoshita; K Hirota; K Yamamoto; T Kobayashi; S Murakami
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in cattle sedated with xylazine.

Authors:  Shozo Arai
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Sequential changes of auditory brain stem responses in relation to intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and initiation of secondary brain stem damage.

Authors:  N Kawahara; M Sasaki; K Mii; M Tsuzuki; K Takakura
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Considerations after intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  L Carenini; E Bottacchi; M Camerlingo; A Mamoli
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1989-06

6.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 7.  Brain dysfunction in critically ill patients--the intensive care unit and beyond.

Authors:  Nuala J Meyer; Jesse B Hall
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.