Literature DB >> 4025298

Confounding and misclassification.

S Greenland, J M Robins.   

Abstract

The authors examine some recently proposed criteria for determining when to adjust for covariates related to misclassification, and show these criteria to be incorrect. In particular, they show that when misclassification is present, covariate control can sometimes increase net bias, even when the covariate would have been a confounder under perfect classification, and even if the covariate is a determinant of classification. Thus, bias due to misclassification cannot be adequately dealt with by the methods used for control of confounding. The examples presented also show that the "change-in-estimate" criterion for deciding whether to control a covariate can be systematically misleading when misclassification is present. These results demonstrate that it is necessary to consider the degree of misclassification when deciding whether to control a covariate.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4025298     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  51 in total

1.  Confounding and confounders.

Authors:  R McNamee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Bias in case-control studies. A review.

Authors:  J A Kopec; J M Esdaile
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Variation in the risk of suicide attempts and completed suicides by antidepressant agent in adults: a propensity score-adjusted analysis of 9 years' data.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Amanda R Patrick; Daniel H Solomon; Jyotsna Mehta; Colin Dormuth; Matthew Miller; Jennifer C Lee; Philip S Wang
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05

4.  Vaccination and risk of allergic disease.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Neil Pearce; Harvey Checkoway; David Kriebel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Correcting for measurement error in individual ancestry estimates in structured association tests.

Authors:  Jasmin Divers; Laura K Vaughan; Miguel A Padilla; José R Fernandez; David B Allison; David T Redden
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Nutrition and oral cancer.

Authors:  J R Marshall; P Boyle
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Risk of death and hospital admission for major medical events after initiation of psychotropic medications in older adults admitted to nursing homes.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Kenneth J Rothman; Rebecca A Silliman; M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Association chain graphs: modelling etiological pathways.

Authors:  Michael Höfler; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Roselind Lieb; Jürgen Hoyer; Robert H Friis
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.