Literature DB >> 4024474

Effects of contrast, orientation and binocularity in the pattern evoked potential.

C W Tyler, P A Apkarian.   

Abstract

Monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials were studied as a function of modulation depth (contrast) of a counterphase sinusoidal grating stimulus. A range of spatial and temporal frequencies of stimulation were used. The contrast functions showed many different forms, and were in some cases nonmonotonic. The binocular response usually had a steeper slope than the monocular response. Extrapolating the slope to the zero intercept gave electrophysiological thresholds which did not correspond with psychophysical threshold at any spatial or temporal frequency used. The binocular response was reduced to the monocular level when the orientation difference between the two eyes exceeded about 20 degrees. The data show that the pattern evoked potential is highly specific to many stimulus variables.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4024474     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90183-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Motion opponency in visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger; G M Boynton; J B Demb; E Seidemann; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Selective tuning for contrast in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Ilaria Sani; Elisa Santandrea; Ashkan Golzar; Maria Concetta Morrone; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses.

Authors:  J M Lopes de Faria; O Katsumi; M Arai; T Hirose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Inhibitory interactions in the human vision system revealed in pattern-evoked potentials.

Authors:  D C Burr; M C Morrone
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision.

Authors:  B Bagolini; V Porciatti; B Falsini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Altered visual contrast gain control is sensitive for idiopathic generalized epilepsies.

Authors:  Daehan Won; Wonsuk Kim; W Art Chaovalitwongse; Jeffrey J Tsai
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Contributing factors to VEP grating acuity deficit and inter-ocular acuity difference in children with cerebral visual impairment.

Authors:  Nívea Nunes Cavascan; Solange Rios Salomão; Paula Yuri Sacai; Josenilson Martins Pereira; Daniel Martins Rocha; Adriana Berezovsky
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 9.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Analysis of the stabilized supralinear network.

Authors:  Yashar Ahmadian; Daniel B Rubin; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.026

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.