Literature DB >> 4020950

Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in the horse following intravenous and intramuscular administration.

J A Orsini, L R Soma, J E Rourke, M Park.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of amikacin sulfate (AK) were studied in the horse after intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Serum (Cs), synovial (Csf) and peritoneal (Cpf) fluid concentrations of the drug were measured. Doses of 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg were given. The concentrations at 15 min following i.v. injection were 30.3 +/- 0.3, 61.2 +/- 6.9 and 122.8 +/- 7.4 micrograms/ml, respectively, for the 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg doses. Mean peak Cs values after the intramuscular injections occurred at 1.0 h post-injection and were 13.3 +/- 1.6, 23.0 +/- 0.6 and 29.8 +/- 3.2 micrograms/ml, respectively. The t 1/2 of amikacin was 1.44, 1.57 and 1.14 h for the 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg doses, respectively. In this study, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amikacin sulfate were determined for six pathogens. Based on the MIC and the pharmacokinetic parameters, it would appear that the usual therapeutic dose of amikacin would be between 4.4 and 6.6 mg/kg twice daily and, for the more serious life-threatening infections, dosing three times a day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020950     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00944.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0140-7783            Impact factor:   1.786


  8 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in lactating sheep.

Authors:  A Haritova; L Lashev
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Competitive antagonism of fluorescent gentamicin uptake in the cochlea.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Allan Kachelmeier; P S Steyger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The disposition kinetics, urinary excretion and dosage regimen of amikacin in cross-bred bovine calves.

Authors:  S P Saini; A K Srivastava
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Comparison of 2 techniques for regional antibiotic delivery to the equine forelimb: intraosseous perfusion vs. intravenous perfusion.

Authors:  T D Butt; J V Bailey; P M Dowling; P B Fretz
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Tissue and serum concentrations of amikacin after intramuscular and intrauterine administration to mares in estrus.

Authors:  J A Orsini; M I Park; P A Spencer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Effects of pre-shipping marbofloxacin administration on fever and blood properties in healthy Thoroughbreds transported a long distance.

Authors:  Yoshiro Endo; Takeru Tsuchiya; Takaya Omura; Kenji Nakai; Kenji Korosue; Mutsuki Ishimaru; Yuhiro Ishikawa; Seiji Hobo
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Use of in vitro assays to identify antibiotics that are cytotoxic to normal equine chondrocytes and synovial cells.

Authors:  Lynn Pezzanite; Lyndah Chow; Gabriella Piquini; Gregg Griffenhagen; Dominique Ramirez; Steven Dow; Laurie Goodrich
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Evaluation of Intra-Articular Amikacin Administration in an Equine Non-inflammatory Joint Model to Identify Effective Bactericidal Concentrations While Minimizing Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Lynn Pezzanite; Lyndah Chow; Dean Hendrickson; Daniel L Gustafson; A Russell Moore; Jason Stoneback; Gregg M Griffenhagen; Gabriella Piquini; Jennifer Phillips; Paul Lunghofer; Steven Dow; Laurie R Goodrich
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.