Literature DB >> 4020796

Evaluation of the plain abdominal X-ray in the acute abdomen.

M J Stower, S S Amar, T Mikulin, D M Kean, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of an erect and supine abdominal X-ray was studied prospectively in 97 patients with an acute abdomen. Although 64 (66%) of the radiographs showed an abnormality, the surgical registrar altered his clinical diagnosis on only seven occasions and changed his management on four. A consultant radiologist was the most accurate at reporting the X-rays even without seeing the patient, whilst junior surgical and radiological staff were as accurate as each other. A surgical registrar, however, was more accurate than junior radiologists in making a diagnosis. The investigation was of immediate clinical value in only 4% of the patients, and its use could probably be limited without detriment to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020796      PMCID: PMC1289834          DOI: 10.1177/014107688507800806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  The plain X-ray in the acute abdomen: a surgeon's evaluation.

Authors:  P W Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Department of inappropriate investigations.

Authors:  B Golberg
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-11-12

3.  Evaluation of plain abdominal radiographs in the diagnosis of abdominal pain.

Authors:  R L Eisenberg; P Heineken; M W Hedgcock; M Federle; H I Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Rationalising abdominal radiography in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  G J de Lacey; B K Wignall; S Bradbrooke; J Reidy; S Hussain; B Cramer
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Abdominal radiography in the emergency department: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  T A McCook; C E Ravin; R P Rice
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.721

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  The Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015.

Authors:  Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Susumu Tazuma; Akira Furukawa; Osamu Nishii; Kunihiro Shigematsu; Takeo Azuhata; Atsuo Itakura; Seiji Kamei; Hiroshi Kondo; Shigenobu Maeda; Hiroshi Mihara; Masafumi Mizooka; Toshihiko Nishidate; Hideaki Obara; Norio Sato; Yuichi Takayama; Tomoyuki Tsujikawa; Tomoyuki Fujii; Tetsuro Miyata; Izumi Maruyama; Hiroshi Honda; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

3.  Automated evidence-based critiquing of orders for abdominal radiographs: impact on utilization and appropriateness.

Authors:  L H Harpole; R Khorasani; J Fiskio; G J Kuperman; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Abdominal radiograph requesting in the setting of acute abdominal pain: temporal trends and appropriateness of requesting.

Authors:  G Morris-Stiff; R E Stiff; H Morris-Stiff
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A multi-observer study examining the radiographic visibility of fishbone foreign bodies.

Authors:  S R Ell; A Sprigg; A J Parker
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Plain abdominal radiography in acute abdominal pain--is it really necessary?

Authors:  Sadhishaan Sreedharan; Mark Fiorentino; Sankar Sinha
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.