Literature DB >> 4020511

Spatial-frequency spectrum of patterns changes the visibility of spatial-phase differences.

T B Lawton.   

Abstract

This study showed that spatial-frequency components over a 4-octave range affected the visibility of spatial-phase differences. Contrast thresholds were measured for discrimination between two (+45- and -45-deg) spatial phases of a sinusoidal test grating added to a background grating. The background could contain one or several sinusoidal components, all in 0-deg phase. Phase differences between the test and the background were visible at lower constrasts (1) when test and background frequencies were harmonically related than when they were not, (2) when test and background frequencies were within 1 octave than when they were farther apart, (3) when the fundamental frequency of the background was low than when it was high, and (4) for some discriminations more than for others, after practice. The visibility of phase differences was not affected by additional components in the background if the fundamental and difference frequencies of the background remained unchanged. Observers' reports of their strategies gave information about the types of attentive processing that were used to discriminate phase differences. Attentive processing facilitated phase discrimination for multifrequency gratings spanning a much wider range of spatial frequencies than would be possible by using only local preattentive processing. These results were consistent with the visibility of phase differences being processed by some combination of even- and odd-symmetric simple cells tuned to a wide range of different spatial frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020511     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.2.001140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  3 in total

1.  Training on Movement Figure-Ground Discrimination Remediates Low-Level Visual Timing Deficits in the Dorsal Stream, Improving High-Level Cognitive Functioning, Including Attention, Reading Fluency, and Working Memory.

Authors:  Teri Lawton; John Shelley-Tremblay
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Dynamic cognitive remediation for a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) significantly improves attention, working memory, processing speed, and reading fluency.

Authors:  Teri Lawton; Ming-Xiong Huang
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  A Temporal Sampling Basis for Visual Processing in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Kim Archer; Kristen Pammer; Trichur Raman Vidyasagar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.