Literature DB >> 4020129

Blood pressure measurement in the elderly: correlation of arterial stiffness with difference between intra-arterial and cuff pressures.

T P Finnegan, J D Spence, D G Wong, G A Wells.   

Abstract

Intra-arterial (radial) blood pressure (BP) measurement was compared with the indirect cuff method in 55 healthy volunteers aged from 59-80 years (mean 68.6 +/- 5.2 s.d.). On average, the cuff method underestimated systolic BP by 5 mmHg and overestimated diastolic BP by 8 mmHg. Cuff measurement underestimated systolic BP by greater than 10 mmHg in 17 cases, and by greater than 20 mmHg in three cases. The cuff method overestimated diastolic BP by greater than 10 mmHg in nine cases (one greater than 20 mmHg) and in two cases the cuff overestimated diastolic BP by greater than 30 mmHg, compared with intra-arterial pressures. The differences correlated with pulse wave velocity, an index of arterial stiffness. A pulse wave velocity index reflecting the entire length from the aortic root to the posterior tibial artery (PWVI/ao-pt) gave a correlation (r) of 0.48 (P less than 0.0005) with systolic arterial/cuff (A/C) difference, a correlation of 0.43 (P less than 0.001) with diastolic A/C difference, and a correlation of 0.57 (P less than 0.00001) with the A/C difference in measurement of mean arterial pressure. A positive but weaker correlation was observed between A/C difference and PWVI aorta-femoral. Although the pressure differences were not as great in these healthy elderly subjects as in previous studies of patients suspected of having pseudo-hypertension, caution still appears to be indicated in the interpretation of cuff blood pressure measurement in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020129     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198506000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

1.  Influence of Age on Upper Arm Cuff Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Dean S Picone; Martin G Schultz; Petr Otahal; J Andrew Black; Willem J Bos; Chen-Huan Chen; Hao-Min Cheng; Antoine Cremer; Nathan Dwyer; Ricardo Fonseca; Alun D Hughes; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Peter S Lacy; Esben Laugesen; Nobuyuki Ohte; Stefano Omboni; Christian Ott; Telmo Pereira; Giacomo Pucci; Philip Roberts-Thomson; Niklas B Rossen; Roland E Schmieder; Daisuke Sueta; Kenji Takazawa; Jiguang Wang; Thomas Weber; Berend E Westerhof; Bryan Williams; Hirotsugu Yamada; Eiichiro Yamamoto; James E Sharman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Thomas Pickering
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 3.  Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Isabella Tan; George S Stergiou; Carolina Lombardi; Francesca Saladini; Mark Butlin; Raj Padwal; Kei Asayama; Alberto Avolio; Tammy M Brady; Alan Murray; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  R H Baker; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Finger systolic pressure: its use in screening for hypertension and monitoring.

Authors:  A Close; G Hamilton; S Muriss
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-27

Review 6.  Management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  J David Spence
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.