Literature DB >> 4020056

Comparison of internal fixation techniques in metacarpal fractures.

D Black, R J Mann, R Constine, A U Daniels.   

Abstract

A biomechanical study assessed quantitative differences in the stability that was obtained by five commonly used types of internal fixation employed in metacarpal fractures. The techniques included dorsal plating, dorsal plating combined with an interfragmentary lag screw, crossed Kirschner wires, a single intraosseous wire combined with a single oblique Kirschner wire, and a single intraosseous wire alone. Rigidity and strength in torsion and bending were determined after transverse osteotomy and fixation of the metacarpal were performed. The failure modes for each fixation technique were also observed and described. Significant differences in rigidity were found between the plated configurations (with or without an interfragmentary lag screw) and the wired configurations in both apex dorsal bending and axial torsion. The three wired configurations were not significantly different from each other except in torsion. Analysis of the bending moments that were required to produce both yield and failure in apex dorsal bending and also the energy absorbed to yield showed similar disparity between plated and wired techniques. For metacarpal fixation, dorsal plating with or without lag screws provides significantly more stability than do wired techniques and approaches that provided by intact bones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020056     DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(85)80067-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  23 in total

1.  Comparison between Intramedullary Nailing and Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation for Fractures in the Distal Third of the Metacarpal Bone.

Authors:  Sung Jun Moon; Jae-Won Yang; Si Young Roh; Dong Chul Lee; Jin Soo Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  Comparison of Dorsal Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Unstable Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Eitan Melamed; Richard M Hinds; Michael B Gottschalk; Oran D Kennedy; John T Capo
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-03-08

3.  Higher stability with locking plates in hand surgery? Biomechanical investigation of the TriLock system in a fracture model.

Authors:  Stefanie Doht; Hendrik Jansen; Rainer Meffert; Sönke Frey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Management of metacarpal fractures.

Authors:  Ana Carreño; Mohammed Tahir Ansari; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-06

5.  Treatment of Rolando Fractures by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation using Mini T-Plate and Screws.

Authors:  Mohammad Umar Mumtaz; Fiaz Ahmad; Altaf Ahmad Kawoosa; Imtiyaz Hussain; Iftikhar Wani
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Minifragment screw fixation of oblique metacarpal fractures: a biomechanical analysis of screw types and techniques.

Authors:  Frank A Liporace; Tosca Kinchelow; Salil Gupta; Erik N Kubiak; Matthew McDonnell
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2008-08-29

7.  A new technique of locked, flexible intramedullary nailing of spiral and comminuted fractures of the metacarpals: a series of 21 cases.

Authors:  Mandar V Agashe; Sanjay Phadke; Vikas M Agashe; Hemant Patankar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-08-02

8.  A biomechanical analysis of treatment options for enchondromas of the hand.

Authors:  Teresa J Pianta; Paul S Baldwin; Elifho Obopilwe; Augustus D Mazzocca; Craig M Rodner; Eric A Silverstein
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-03

9.  Fixation for metacarpal neck fracture: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Pramote Malasitt; John R Owen; Marc-Antoine Tremblay; Jennifer S Wayne; Jonathan E Isaacs
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-09

10.  [Metacarpal fractures: treatment indications and options. Results of a multicenter study].

Authors:  M V Küntscher; D J Schäfer; G Germann; H R Siebert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.