Literature DB >> 4017832

Evaluation of Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Long-term results.

R A Kozarek, C M Brayko, R A Sanowski, J L Grobe, J E Phelps, H Sarles, C H Fredell.   

Abstract

Fifteen patients with intractable reflux or its complications were sequentially studied after the placement of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. In all, 16 devices were inserted. Parameters were measured before and 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after prosthesis placement and included symptom scoring, esophageal manometry with Tuttle test, endoscopy, suction biopsy, barium swallow, and gastroesophageal scintigraphy. In addition, a subset of patients underwent stimulation/inhibition of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with pentagastrin, metoclopramide, edrophonium, and atropine. At a mean time of 16 months postsurgery, 10 of 16 (63%) patients were reflux-free and there was significant improvement in endoscopic, biopsy, and symptom scoring. Post-insertion, there were statistically significant increments in LES pressure with intravenous boluses of pentagastrin, metoclopramide, and edrophonium, and a significant decrease with atropine. Two patients who developed prosthesis herniation into the chest required removal because of ongoing reflux and dysphagia. An additional patient had prosthesis disruption and migration, which also required removal. Four patients with previously failed antireflux procedures had five prostheses placed. All continued to reflux postoperatively. No patient who was initially reflux-free subsequently developed reflux, despite a tendency for LES pressure to decline with time. Although this procedure proved effective for up to 36 months in patients who had had no previous antireflux procedure, the displacement rate (3/16 = 19%), reoperation rate (3/16 = 19%), and the progressive decline in LES pressure over time should make one cautious about its routine use in the surgical treatment of reflux esophagitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4017832     DOI: 10.1007/bf01320485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  29 in total

Review 1.  Metoclopramide.

Authors:  K Schulze-Delrieu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Mechanism of action of pentagastrin on the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  R Zwick; K L Bowes; E E Daniel; S K Sarna
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man.

Authors:  F Ismail-Beigi; P F Horton; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  More misadventures with the esophageal collar.

Authors:  R E Condon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates.

Authors:  S B Benjamin; T K Knuff; M Fink; E Woods; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Penetration into the stomach. A complication of the antireflux prosthesis.

Authors:  C Lackey; J Potts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Lower oesophageal sphincter response to gastrin--pharmacological or physiological?

Authors:  J M Henderson; G Lidgard; D H Osborne; D C Carter; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J F Helm; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  The antireflux mechanism.

Authors:  D A Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux using the Angelchik prosthesis.

Authors:  J R Starling; M O Reichelderfer; J R Pellett; F O Belzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of the Angelchik prosthesis for treatment of symptomatic esophageal reflux.

Authors:  J R Starling; J W Hamilton; M Reichelderfer; D T Yamato; J R Pellet; F O Belzer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.

Authors:  D F Evans; C S Robertson; D L Morris; S J Ledingham; J Doran; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.