Literature DB >> 4017674

Roentgenographic evaluation of mediastinal nodes for preoperative assessment in lung cancer.

R J McKenna, H I Libshitz, C E Mountain, M J McMurtrey.   

Abstract

Evaluation of mediastinal nodal metastases is a critical step in the assessment of potential surgical candidates with lung cancer. Mediastinal tomography (TOMO) and chest computerized tomography (CT) visualize the mediastinal nodes more clearly than a chest roentgenogram (CXR). A prospective study was undertaken to determine the clinical value of these three tests for mediastinal staging in 102 surgical patients with lung cancer. All patients underwent thoracotomy and mediastinal nodal dissection. The roentgenographic findings were compared with the histologic evaluation of paratracheal, tracheobronchial angle, aortic window, subcarinal, and inferior pulmonary ligament nodes. TOMO, and especially CT, correctly predicted the size and location of mediastinal nodes; however, the overall accuracies were CXR (74 percent), TOMO (74 percent), CT (61 percent). These results demonstrated that the improvement in mediastinal imaging is counteracted by the fact that enlarged nodes need not contain metastases and normal-appearing small nodes may harbor microscopic disease. Computed tomography and TOMO had little clinical impact on the assessment of mediastinal nodes in potential surgical candidates with lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4017674     DOI: 10.1378/chest.88.2.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna-Bk Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Daphne Antillon; Jamal-A Ibdah; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna Batapati Krishna Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Jamal-A Ibdah; Daphne Antillon; Shailender Singh; Mojtaba Olyaee; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound advances, part 1: diagnosis.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Pathological assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer: implications for non-invasive mediastinal staging.

Authors:  K M Kerr; D Lamb; C G Wathen; W S Walker; N J Douglas
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  S J Herman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Bronchogenic carcinoma: incidence of metastases to normal sized lymph nodes.

Authors:  T Arita; T Kuramitsu; M Kawamura; T Matsumoto; N Matsunaga; K Sugi; K Esato
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Economic analysis of combined endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Jorge Pascual; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy Woodward; Margaret Johnson; Barbara McComb; John Odell; Laith H Jamil; Kanwar Rupinder S Gill; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography scanning for the diagnosis and management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Bruce R Line; Charles S White
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-02

Review 10.  PET-CT in clinical oncology.

Authors:  A Maldonado; F J González-Alenda; M Alonso; J M Sierra
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.340

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.