Literature DB >> 4016531

The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis--some reservations.

D Durrans, C P Armstrong, T V Taylor.   

Abstract

A prospective study has been made of the use of the Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of hiatus hernia and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Forty-one patients under the care of one surgeon were studied over a 3-year period. The operation is simple and safe to perform. Twelve patients suffered transient dysphagia which spontaneously resolved within 3 months. Satisfactory results were obtained thereafter in 80.9 per cent. Seven of the prostheses have been removed (17.1 per cent), all within 18 months of performing the operation. Dysphagia and recurrent symptoms were the main reasons for removal and in two of these stricturing was present pre-operatively. We feel the presence of an established stricture is a contraindication to the use of the device. We have, however, been impressed by its use as a second procedure when previous surgery has failed and when revisional surgery for recurrent hiatus hernia is difficult due to dense adhesion formation. While it is still early to assess the legacy that the use of this prosthesis might incur, we would recommend conservatism if not abandonment of its use until longer-term evaluation is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4016531     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of action of antireflux surgery: theory and fact.

Authors:  A G Little
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Antireflux surgery.

Authors:  T V Taylor; S Holt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-23

3.  Assessment of the Angelchik prosthesis for treatment of symptomatic esophageal reflux.

Authors:  J R Starling; J W Hamilton; M Reichelderfer; D T Yamato; J R Pellet; F O Belzer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.

Authors:  F D Salama
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience.

Authors:  A G Timoney; J M Kelly; M R Welfare
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.

Authors:  D F Evans; C S Robertson; D L Morris; S J Ledingham; J Doran; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.

Authors:  M Deakin; D Mayer; J G Temple
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Vertical gastric plication: an operation for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  T V Taylor; R A Knox; B R Pullan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Disappearance of an Anglechik prosthesis.

Authors:  I S Gill; D Millar
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 10.  The knife or the pill in the long-term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  L R Lundell
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1994 May-Aug
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.