Literature DB >> 4016395

Surgical drainage.

S R Smith, O J Gilmore.   

Abstract

The principle factor governing the efficacy of a drain is the tissue reaction to the constituent material. This was appreciated during the early development of drainage. Modern materials have been available for more than 20 years but have escaped sound clinical evaluation. In abdominal surgery there is virtually no evidence to support routine intraperitoneal drainage especially with latex rubber unless it is intended to create a fibrous tract as with T-tube drainage of the biliary tree. When drainage is used either static symphonage (Fig. 7), low pressure suction or sump suction with a bacterial air inlet filter should be employed. Silicone rubber (Silastic) tubes are the preferred material. In the parietes closed suction drainage is safe and has achieved a sound reputation for improving healing where serosanguinous oozing is expected. High pressure suction is probably the most effective system. Because of the risk of infection, open drainage systems should, in general, be avoided, especially where a prosthesis is present. Finally, if in doubt, all surgeons should recall the words of Halsteads in 1898 "No drainage at all is better than the ignorant employment of it" rather than the advice of Lawson Tait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4016395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Hosp Med        ISSN: 0007-1064


  7 in total

1.  Drains in urology: an unnecessary habit.

Authors:  Manuel Patubo Yuhico
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The effectiveness and appropriate management of abdominal drains in patients undergoing elective liver resection: a retrospective analysis and prospective case series.

Authors:  Kuniya Tanaka; Takafumi Kumamoto; Kazunori Nojiri; Kazuhisa Takeda; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Method of one-way surgical drainage for the inexpensive accurate measurement of abdominal secretions.

Authors:  J F Chester; D C Britton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Marco Catarci; Giacomo Ruffo; Massimo Giuseppe Viola; Felice Pirozzi; Paolo Delrio; Felice Borghi; Gianluca Garulli; Gianandrea Baldazzi; Pierluigi Marini; Giuseppe Sica
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage. Results of a prospective study in 61 patients.

Authors:  D Franco; A Karaa; J L Meakins; G Borgonovo; C Smadja; D Grange
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial.

Authors:  J Belghiti; M Kabbej; A Sauvanet; V Vilgrain; Y Panis; F Fekete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Chi-Leung Liu; Sheung-Tat Fan; Chung-Mau Lo; Yik Wong; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.