Literature DB >> 4015222

Abdominal CT scanning in critically ill surgical patients.

S H Norwood, J M Civetta.   

Abstract

Clinical parameters, intensive care unit (ICU) course, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, and the clinical decisions of 53 critically ill patients were reviewed to determine the influence of the CT scan. No scans were positive before the eighth day. Sensitivity was 48% and specificity, 64%. Seventeen (23%) scans of the 72 provided beneficial results: eight localized abscesses that were drained; nine were negative and not operated on. Five (7%) scans provided detrimental information: scan negative with abscess discovered or scan positive but negative laparotomy. Fifty (70%) scans were either of no help or not used in management. The mortality rate was 50% when CT led to an intervention, and 47% in the entire group. Hospital charges were +33,408. Personnel time and cost were 497 hours and +3658; of the total +37,066, 77% (+28,541) could be considered wasted. From these data, it was concluded that CT scans should be used to confirm abscesses, not to search for a source of sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4015222      PMCID: PMC1250870          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198508000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal abscesses.

Authors:  W A Altemeier; W R Culbertson; W D Fullen; C D Shook
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Specific but limited role of new imaging techniques in decision-making about intraabdominal abscesses.

Authors:  H K Wright; E Dunn; J D MacArthur; O Pelliccia
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Role of ultrasonography, gallium scanning, and computed tomography in the diagnosis of intraabdominal abscess.

Authors:  C Moir; R E Robins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Computed tomographic evaluation of intra-abdominal abscesses in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  M S Shin; K J Ho; C Heald; D M Witten; S Y Han
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Effectiveness of computed tomography in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal abscess: A review of 111 patients.

Authors:  J Roche
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-07-25       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Determinants of death in patients with intraabdominal abscess.

Authors:  D E Fry; R N Garrison; R C Heitsch; K Calhoun; H C Polk
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Diagnosis of intra-abdominal and pelvic abscesses by computerized tomography.

Authors:  P R Koehler; A A Moss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-07-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Computed tomography in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal abscesses.

Authors:  R H Daffner; M D Halber; C L Morgan; W S Trought; W M Thompson; R P Rice
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Diagnosis of abdominal abscesses with computed tomography, ultrasound, and 111In leukocyte scans.

Authors:  J Q Knochel; P R Koehler; T G Lee; D M Welch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Accuracy of techniques to detect intraperitoneal abscess.

Authors:  L Norton; J Eule; D Burdick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  9 in total

1.  Abdominal computed tomography for postoperative abscess: is it useful during the first week?

Authors:  Jared L Antevil; John C Egan; Robert O Woodbury; Louis Rivera; Eamon B Oreilly; Carlos V R Brown
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Can postoperative complications be predicted by a routine CT scan on day 5? A study of 78 laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  M Wagner; M Zappa; L Maggiori; F Bretagnol; V Vilgrain; Y Panis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Drainoscopy: a doorway to the abdomen in the post-surgical patient.

Authors:  S Atallah; T deBeche-Adams; Z Imam; K Amir
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  How to Avoid Nontherapeutic Laparotomy in Patients With Multiple Organ Failure of Unknown Origin. The Role of CT Scan Revisited.

Authors:  Stephanie Li Sun Fui; Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Christophe Trésallet; Matthieu Faron; Gaelle Godiris-Petit; Harika Salepcioglu; Severine Noullet; Fabrice Menegaux
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  O D Rotstein; J L Meakins
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prediction of postoperative complications after urgent laparotomy by intraperitoneal microdialysis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Colin L Verdant; Marialuisa Chierego; Véronique De Moor; Reza Chamlou; Jacques Creteur; Jean de Dieu Mutijima; Patricia Loi; Michel Gelin; Antonino Gullo; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Complications requiring reoperation following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  J D Cunningham; M T Weyant; M Levitt; S T Brower; A H Aufses
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1998-08

8.  Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Robert R Hutchins; M Paul Gunning; D Nuala Lucas; Timothy G Allen-Mersh; Neil C Soni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Diagnostic laparoscopy in the intensive care patient. Avoiding the nontherapeutic laparotomy.

Authors:  C P Brandt; P P Priebe; M L Eckhauser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.