Literature DB >> 4012937

A comparison of bipolar and monopolar diathermy probes in experimental animals.

J W Ramsay, N A Shepherd, M Butler, P T Gosling, R A Miller, D M Wallace, H N Whitfield.   

Abstract

The effects of monopolar and bipolar diathermy were studied in laboratory animals. The power required to coagulate transected vessels in air was established and the effect of immersion in saline and water during electrocoagulation was investigated. Tissue heat conduction from each type of probe was measured and compared. Tissue damage was assessed by light microscopy of histochemically stained sections. The bipolar system operated at a lower power output (13 W) with less heat conduction, and was unaffected by the surrounding medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4012937     DOI: 10.1007/bf00261575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  3 in total

1.  The heater probe: a new endoscopic method for stopping massive gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  R L Protell; C E Rubin; D C Auth; F E Silverstein; F Terou; M Dennis; J R Piercey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Surgical diathermy - a review.

Authors:  J C Taunton
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1981-07

3.  Rectal temperature monitoring during neodymion-YAG laser irradiation for prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  H O Beisland; E Stranden
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1984
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  In vivo effect of 5 French bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical probes on the porcine bladder.

Authors:  R D Tucker; E V Kramolowsky; C E Platz
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

2.  Regulated high frequency diathermy for bipolar electrocoagulation--a new method for the treatment of carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  M Kriegmair; J Pensel; A G Hofstetter; K Fastenmeier; K H Rothenberger; E Keiditsch; T M Boemers
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1987

Review 3.  Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors.

Authors:  N J van de Berg; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen; C A Grimbergen; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Suture? Staple? Electrosurgery? How to decide what is best for you.

Authors:  J E Carter
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.