Literature DB >> 400897

Motor activity: a survey of methods with potential use in toxicity testing.

L W Reiter1, R C MacPhail.   

Abstract

Activity measurements are expected to have widespread use in toxicity testing. The multifaceted nature of motor activity will directly influence the selection of a measurement technique since the relative contribution of various motor acts to any particular measurement will depend upon the detection method. Because of the apparatus-dependent nature of motor activity measurements, it is recommended that consideration be given to how accurately the various devices measure locomotor activity. In the present paper, two types of body movement will be considered as locomotor activity: ambulation (horizontally directed movement) and rearing (vertically directed movement). Discussion focuses on the various methods currently used to record motor activity, the various components of motor activity which are likely to be recorded, and the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques for the measurement of locomotor activity. Finally, consideration is given to studies which have compared treatment effects on motor activity derived from two or more measurement techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 400897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobehav Toxicol        ISSN: 0191-3581


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cross-species assessments of motor and exploratory behavior related to bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Brook L Henry; Arpi Minassian; Jared W Young; Martin P Paulus; Mark A Geyer; William Perry
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Animal behavioral methods in neurotoxicity assessment: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  B Kulig; E Alleva; G Bignami; J Cohn; D Cory-Slechta; V Landa; J O'Donoghue; D Peakall
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Behavioral consequences of radiation exposure to simulated space radiation in the C57BL/6 mouse: open field, rotorod, and acoustic startle.

Authors:  Michael J Pecaut; Paul Haerich; Cara N Zuccarelli; Anna L Smith; Eric D Zendejas; Gregory A Nelson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  A computer-supported method for analyzing behavioral observations: studies with stereotypy.

Authors:  M H Lewis; A A Baumeister; D L McCorkle; R B Mailman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Potential interactions between GABAb and cholinergic systems: baclofen augments scopolamine-induced performance deficits in the eight-arm radial maze.

Authors:  E S Sidel; H A Tilson; R L McLamb; W A Wilson; H S Swartzwelder
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Risk assessment for neurobehavioral toxicity.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Comprehensive neurotoxicity assessment.

Authors:  B M Kulig
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.