Literature DB >> 4008358

Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. II. Behavior.

G R Dellmeier, T H Friend, E E Gbur.   

Abstract

Holstein bull calves (N = 46) were blocked by birth order and randomly assigned to be individually reared in stalls, pens or hutches (trials I and II) or as a group in a 3.6 X 7.9 m yard (trial II only). Treatments differed by the degree of restraint and social isolation imposed, with stalls the most restrictive and yard the least. Stalls and pens had wooden slatted floors; hutches and yard were on ground. Calves were placed on treatment within 24 h of birth and remained on treatment 6.5 wk. Total time standing or lying per 24 h in situ at 5 wk was not affected by treatment (P greater than .05), but hutch calves changed position between standing and lying more often than others (P less than .05), in order to remain in sun or shade. At 6.5 wk, calves (N = 24) in trial II were individually open-field tested for 20 min in the presence of alien calves. Stall and pen calves performed more actions utilized in locomotion and defense and engaged in more social behavior than hutch or yard calves (P less than .05). Only stall and pen calves stumbled and fell, but observations were insufficient to allow statistical analysis of these incidents. Treatment effects were found with respect to vocalizations: stall and pen calves emitted more "baaocks," while yard calves emitted more "moos." Results of this study and of a companion physiological study of the calves suggest that the intensification of drives induced by chronic suppression of their release may be accompanied by physiological responses associated with chronic stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4008358     DOI: 10.2527/jas1985.6051102x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Growth and survival of Holstein and Brown Swiss calves reared outdoors in individual hutches.

Authors:  O Ertugrul; O Alpan; N Unal; F Azeroglu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Housing, feeding and management of calves and replacement heifers in Swedish dairy herds.

Authors:  K Pettersson; C Svensson; P Liberg
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2006-06-06

4.  Host adapted intramammary infections in pregnant heifers which were co-housed and reared on fresh milk as calves.

Authors:  Inge-Marié Petzer; Joanne Karzis; Maia Lesosky; Johanna C Watermeyer; Renette Badenhorst
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.