Literature DB >> 4007508

Testing of concentric visual field constriction by means of scotopic visually evoked potentials.

J Petersen, K Airas.   

Abstract

Using scotopic visually evoked potentials (VEP), an objective test of concentric absolute field defects is presented. At 0.8 log units above the mean VEP threshold, the full field, the central area of 50 degrees diameter, and the complementary peripheral field were flash stimulated. In 13 normal subjects the peripheral VEP response was larger in amplitude and shorter in latency compared to the central response. In four cases of concentric field restriction due to hysteria and malingering, the same results were found. In three cases of retinitis pigmentosa and advanced glaucoma, the peripheral VEP sensitivity was worse than the central one or no response could be found. The amount of stray light was estimated as the difference of the thresholds for central and peripheral stimulation (1.6 to 1.8 log units) in a patient with a residual central field of 20 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4007508     DOI: 10.1007/bf02150947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  Visually evoked cortical potential (VECP) in dichromats.

Authors:  E Zrenner; M Kojima
Journal:  Mod Probl Ophthalmol       Date:  1976

2.  ALTERATIONS OF VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSE IN THE PRESENCE OF HOMONYMOUS VISUAL DEFECTS.

Authors:  H G VAUGHAN; R KATZMAN; J TAYLOR
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-10

3.  Retinal distribution of entoptic stray light.

Authors:  D W DEMOTT; R M BOYNTON
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1958-01

4.  The human visual evoked cortical potential and dark adaptation.

Authors:  R L Klingaman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  [Evoked potentials and visual acuity].

Authors:  Y Grall; F Rigaudiere; S Delthil; J F Legargasson; J Sourdille
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  [Some problems in electroperimetric investigation by means of visual evoked cortical potentials (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Müller; E Haase; R Niedlich
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-07-04

7.  Objective determination of dark adaptation: accuracy of the evoked potential method.

Authors:  K Airas; J Petersen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Objective perimetry by evoked potential recording: limitations.

Authors:  D Regan; B A Milner
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-03

9.  Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton; G Ettlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Tests for malingering in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Objective measurement of forward-scattered light in the human eye: An electrophysiological approach.

Authors:  Benjamin Solf; Stefan Schramm; Dietmar Link; Sascha Klee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.