Literature DB >> 4003434

The developmental field concept.

J M Opitz.   

Abstract

Identical anomalies produced by such different causes as aneuploidy, gene mutation, teratogenic chemicals, and certain surgical procedures show that embryonic primordia respond as units in the production of anomalies of anatomical structure. Hence, they must also act as units during normal ontogeny. The presence of identical malformations in different mammalian species identifies developmental and anatomical homology by virtue of descent from a common ancestor. These dys- and orthomorphogenetically reactive units are the equivalents of the classical experimental embryologist's epimorphic fields, which are those units of the embryo in which the development of complex structures appropriate to the species is determined and controlled in a spatially coordinated, temporally synchronous, and epimorphically hierarchical manner that expresses both species-nonspecific (that is, phylogenetic) and species-specific genetically coded developmental information. Thus, there is some merit in taking a long view of development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4003434     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  11 in total

1.  Recurrence risk figures for isolated tetralogy of Fallot after screening for 22q11 microdeletion.

Authors:  M C Digilio; B Marino; A Giannotti; A Toscano; B Dallapiccola
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  2011 William Allan Award introduction: John M. Opitz.

Authors:  Maximilian Muenke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Colobomatous malformations of the eye.

Authors:  I H Maumenee; T N Mitchell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1990

4.  Anomalous inheritance in a kindred with split hand, split foot malformation.

Authors:  M Spranger; J Schapera
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  VACTERL/VATER Association.

Authors:  Benjamin D Solomon
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 6.  Congenital malformations: an inquiry into classification and nomenclature.

Authors:  H Kalter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Errors of geometry: regeneration in a broader perspective.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Results of lacrimal assessment in patients with congenital clinical anophthalmos or blind microphthalmos.

Authors:  M P Schittkowski; R F Guthoff
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Dandy-Walker malformation: analysis of 38 cases.

Authors:  I Pascual-Castroviejo; A Velez; S I Pascual-Pascual; M C Roche; F Villarejo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Congenital anomalies of kidney and hand: a review.

Authors:  Gopalakrishnan Natarajan; Dhanapriya Jeyachandran; Bala Subramaniyan; Dineshkumar Thanigachalam; Arul Rajagopalan
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2013-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.