Literature DB >> 4002871

Results of the international field trial with the Reason for Encounter Classification.

H Lamberts, S Meads, M Wood.   

Abstract

The Reason for Encounter Classification (RFEC) was designed by a WHO Working Party to classify the reasons why patients seek care at the primary care level. It is designed along two axes: Chapters and Components. Each chapter carries an alpha-code which is the first character of the basic 3-character alphanumeric code. Each chapter is subdivided into seven "components" carrying 2-digit numeric codes. The field trial was undertaken by family physicians and nurses in: Australia, Barbados, Brazil, Hungary, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway and the US. 90497 RFE's were analysed. Their distribution over the chapters and components characterize the content of international primary care. Listings with the most common RFE's in the participating countries reflect the cultural differences. It is concluded that the RFEC is not only feasible to classify reasons why patients seek care but also to classify the diagnosis and the process of primary care. As a result of this, the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) succeeds the RFEC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4002871     DOI: 10.1007/bf02083050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soz Praventivmed        ISSN: 0303-8408


  4 in total

1.  The NAPCRG process classification for primary care.

Authors:  H L Tindall; L Culpepper; J Froom; R A Henderson; A D Richards; W W Rosser; H T Wiegert
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Family medicine classification systems in evolution.

Authors:  M Wood
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  The WHO Reason-for-Encounter Classification.

Authors:  S Meads
Journal:  WHO Chron       Date:  1983

4.  International classification of diseases: ninth revision.

Authors:  K Kupka
Journal:  WHO Chron       Date:  1978-06
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Why the 'reason for encounter' should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care.

Authors:  Tim C olde Hartman; Hiske van Ravesteijn; Peter Lucassen; Kees van Boven; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Chris van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.