Literature DB >> 3999035

Behaviour of motor units of human arm muscles: differences between slow isometric contraction and relaxation.

J J Denier van der Gon, B M ter Haar Romeny, E J van Zuylen.   

Abstract

The behaviour of motor units in the m. biceps brachii (long head), in the m. brachialis and in the m. supinator during slow isometric contraction and relaxation was studied when subjects were performing different motor tasks. These tasks were: flexion of the elbow joint, supination of the forearm and exorotation of the humerus. Motor unit activity was recorded by means of bipolar fine wire electrodes. In the long head of the biceps, motor unit activity was recorded at medial, central and lateral sites. When the subject relaxed from flexion, the firing rate of motor units located in the biceps and the brachialis was always found to be lower than that at the corresponding level of flexion force during contraction. The firing rate during relaxation decreased slowly and almost linearly with force. However, during relaxation from supination or exorotation, the firing rate of motor units at medial and central locations in the biceps was more or less constant until decruitment. The firing rate of motor units of the supinator during relaxation from supination decreased slowly and was lower than during contraction. Motor units located medially and centrally in the biceps had decruitment thresholds for flexion that were lower than their recruitment thresholds. Motor units on the lateral side of the biceps did not show such a difference. In the brachialis decruitment thresholds for flexion were usually higher than the recruitment thresholds. Differences between decruitment and recruitment thresholds for motor units in the biceps were much more pronounced for supination and exorotation than for flexion. For motor units in the supinator the decruitment threshold during relaxation from supination was higher than the recruitment threshold. The time that had passed after the onset of firing of a motor unit did not influence its decruitment threshold. If, after complete relaxation, the exerted force was increased again, it appeared that the recruitment threshold was changed. It took about 4 s to reach the original recruitment threshold. It is concluded that the relation between the firing rate of a motor unit and total exerted force depends on the phase of contraction. This relation varies within a muscle and between muscles. Furthermore, the results indicate an interchange of activity within the motoneurone pools of the synergists involved in isometrical motor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3999035      PMCID: PMC1193367          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  10 in total

1.  Relative contribution of individual muscles to the isometric contraction of a muscular group.

Authors:  J C Cnockaert; G Lensel; E Pertuzon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The effect of activation history on tension production by individual muscle units.

Authors:  R E Burke; P Rudomin; F E Zajac
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-06-18       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions.

Authors:  H S Milner-Brown; R B Stein; R Yemm
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study.

Authors:  M A Johnson; J Polgar; D Weightman; D Appleton
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle.

Authors:  R S Person; L P Kudina
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-05

6.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks.

Authors:  B M ter Haar Romeny; J J van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle.

Authors:  B M ter Haar Romeny; J J Denier van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions.

Authors:  C J De Luca; R S LeFever; M P McCue; A P Xenakis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Human motor unit activity during the onset of muscle fatigue in submaximal isometric isotonic contraction.

Authors:  B Maton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1981

10.  Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions.

Authors:  C G Kukulka; H P Clamann
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-08-24       Impact factor: 3.252

  10 in total
  25 in total

1.  Ia Afferent input alters the recruitment thresholds and firing rates of single human motor units.

Authors:  G Grande; E Cafarelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  External perturbation of the trunk in standing humans differentially activates components of the medial back muscles.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans.

Authors:  Toshitaka Kimura; Kentaro Yamanaka; Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Tasuku Miyoshi; Masami Akai; Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Discharge characteristics of biceps brachii motor units at recruitment when older adults sustained an isometric contraction.

Authors:  Michael A Pascoe; Matthew R Holmes; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Evaluation of plateau-potential-mediated 'warm up' in human motor units.

Authors:  Andrew J Fuglevand; Andrea P Dutoit; Richard K Johns; Douglas A Keen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Mandibular physiological tremor is reduced by increasing-force ramp contractions and periodontal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Surface electromyogram spectral characterization and motor unit activity during voluntary ramp contraction in men.

Authors:  K Seki; Y Miyazaki; M Watanabe; A Nagata; M Narusawa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

8.  Postural control at the human wrist.

Authors:  John Z Z Chew; Simon C Gandevia; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cortical and subcortical mechanisms for precisely controlled force generation and force relaxation.

Authors:  Matthew B Spraker; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  A model for neural control of gradation of muscle force.

Authors:  A A Tax; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.