UNLABELLED: In an underground isolation unit, 42 subjects were living singly for time spans of at least 7 days up to more than a month. Except three who were entrained to 24 h by an externally controlled light-dark cycle (LD), subjects had no time cues and developed free-running circadian rhythms either in self-selected LD-cycles or in constant illumination. Each subject had to give a signal whenever he thought that 1 h had passed. In addition, 30 subjects produced short-time intervals within the range from 10 to 120 s. RESULTS: The 1-h estimates were longer than 1 h, and had a strong positive correlation with the duration of wakefulness alpha as well as with the length of the circadian cycle. The short time estimates were equally distributed between under- and over-estimation of the required interval, and they were neither correlated with the 1-h estimates nor with alpha. It is concluded that long and short time estimates are based on different mechanisms.
UNLABELLED: In an underground isolation unit, 42 subjects were living singly for time spans of at least 7 days up to more than a month. Except three who were entrained to 24 h by an externally controlled light-dark cycle (LD), subjects had no time cues and developed free-running circadian rhythms either in self-selected LD-cycles or in constant illumination. Each subject had to give a signal whenever he thought that 1 h had passed. In addition, 30 subjects produced short-time intervals within the range from 10 to 120 s. RESULTS: The 1-h estimates were longer than 1 h, and had a strong positive correlation with the duration of wakefulness alpha as well as with the length of the circadian cycle. The short time estimates were equally distributed between under- and over-estimation of the required interval, and they were neither correlated with the 1-h estimates nor with alpha. It is concluded that long and short time estimates are based on different mechanisms.