Literature DB >> 3997242

Immune responses of CBA/J mice to graded infections with Toxocara canis.

S G Kayes, P E Omholt, R B Grieve.   

Abstract

The immunological responsiveness of CBA/J mice infected with various numbers of the canine ascarid, Toxocara canis, was characterized after a single infection to ascertain the smallest infection capable of perturbing the immune system of the host. Mice receiving the lowest inoculations (5 eggs per mouse or 0.25 larvae per g of body weight) had detectable alterations in the number of circulating peripheral blood eosinophils and spleen weight-to-body weight ratios. Mice infected with 25 eggs each (1.25 larvae per g of body weight) showed augmented concanavalin A-elicited splenic lymphocyte transformation and a positive lymphocyte transformation in response to a toxocaral antigen preparation in addition to even higher eosinophil counts and heavier spleens. Spleen cells from mice receiving the two largest inocula (125 eggs and 250 eggs per mouse or 6.25 and 12.5 larvae per g of body weight, respectively) had in addition to the above responses a sixfold increase in spontaneous DNA synthesis. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for mouse antibody responses to T. canis indicated that the time of onset as well as the magnitude of the antitoxocaral humoral response is directly proportional to the size of the inoculation used to initiate the infection. Finally, we showed that allowing the infection to become protracted results in some responses increasing somewhat in magnitude, but regardless of length of infection, the magnitude of any of the responses examined is proportional to the size of the infection. The results indicate that different host responses have different thresholds of sensitization and suggest that larvacidal reactions which require intricate interactions among several components of the immune system may not occur in very small infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3997242      PMCID: PMC261234          DOI: 10.1128/iai.48.3.697-703.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  29 in total

1.  NEMATODE INDUCED HYPERSENISTIVITY REACTIONS IN GUINEA PIGS: ONSET OF EOSINOPHILIA AND POSITIVE SCHULTZ-DALE REACTIONS FOLLOWING GRADED INFECTIONS WITH TOXOCARA CANIS.

Authors:  L J OLSON; C W SCHULZ
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1963-12-30       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Experimental toxocariasis. I. Some observations on the histopathology of the migration of Toxocara canis larvae in the mouse.

Authors:  C H Burren
Journal:  Z Parasitenkd       Date:  1968

3.  Toxocara canis infection in baboons. I. Antibody, white-cell, and serum-protein responses following infection.

Authors:  T I Aljeboori; M H Ivey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Experimental visceral larva migrans in monkeys. I. Clinical, hematological, biochemical and gross pathological observations on monkeys inoculated with embryonated eggs of the dog ascarid, Toxocara canis.

Authors:  T Tomimura; M Yokota; H Takiguchi
Journal:  Nihon Juigaku Zasshi       Date:  1976-12

5.  Stage-specific antibody-dependent eosinophil-mediated destruction of Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  J W Kazura; D I Grove
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Immunologic aspects of host responses to schistosomiasis: resistance, immunopathology, and eosinophil involvement.

Authors:  S M Phillips; D G Colley
Journal:  Prog Allergy       Date:  1978

7.  Effect of inoculum size and length of infection on the distribution of Toxocara canis larvae in the mouse.

Authors:  S G Kayes; J A Oaks
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Visceral larva migrans. A review and reassessment indicating two forms of clinical expression: visceral and ocular.

Authors:  W H Zinkham
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1978-06

9.  Larva-specific antibodies in patients with visceral larva migrans.

Authors:  R H Cypess; M H Karol; J L Zidian; L T Glickman; D Gitlin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Antibody-dependent eosinophil-mediated damage to 51Cr-labeled schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni: damage by purieid eosinophils.

Authors:  A E Butterworth; J R David; D Franks; A A Mahmoud; P H David; R F Sturrock; V Houba
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  10 in total

1.  Toxocara canis larvae reinfecting BALB/c mice exhibit accelerated speed of migration to the host CNS.

Authors:  Petra Kolbeková; David Větvička; Jan Svoboda; Karl Skírnisson; Markéta Leissová; Martin Syrůček; Helena Marečková; Libuše Kolářová
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Eosinophilic myocarditis in CBA/J mice infected with Toxocara canis.

Authors:  M Cookston; M Stober; S G Kayes
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of Toxocara infection using a rat model.

Authors:  Vachel Gay V Paller; Cyrelle M Besana; Isabel Kristine M Valdez
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Use of bronchoalveolar lavage to compare local pulmonary immunity with the systemic immune response of Toxocara canis-infected mice.

Authors:  S G Kayes; R E Jones; P E Omholt
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Effect of various doses of infective Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati eggs on the humoral response and distribution of larvae in mice.

Authors:  K Havasiová-Reiterová; O Tomasovicová; P Dubinský
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Neurotoxocarosis: marked preference of Toxocara canis for the cerebrum and T. cati for the cerebellum in the paratenic model host mouse.

Authors:  Elisabeth Janecek; Andreas Beineke; Thomas Schnieder; Christina Strube
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Abnormal neurobehaviour and impaired memory function as a consequence of Toxocara canis- as well as Toxocara cati-induced neurotoxocarosis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Janecek; Patrick Waindok; Marion Bankstahl; Christina Strube
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-05-08

8.  Clinical and Laboratory Findings among Patients with Toxocariasis in Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam in 2017-2019.

Authors:  Le Dinh Vinh Phuc; Cao Ba Loi; Huynh Hong Quang; Le Duc Vinh; Cao Truong Sinh; Vu Van Du; Que Anh Tram; Khong Minh Quang; Tang Xuan Hai; Tran-Anh Le
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

9.  The consequences of parasitic infection for the behavior of the mammalian host.

Authors:  P J Donovick; R G Burright
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Potential Novel Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: Toxocara canis Infection Increases Tumor Size Due to Modulation of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment.

Authors:  Rocío Alejandra Ruiz-Manzano; Margarita Isabel Palacios-Arreola; Rosalía Hernández-Cervantes; Víctor Hugo Del Río-Araiza; Karen Elizabeth Nava-Castro; Pedro Ostoa-Saloma; Samira Muñoz-Cruz; Jorge Morales-Montor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.