Literature DB >> 3994993

Pressure effects on actin self-assembly: interspecific differences in the equilibrium and kinetics of the G to F transformation.

R R Swezey, G N Somero.   

Abstract

Purified skeletal muscle actins from species whose ambient pressures range from 1 to greater than 500 atm were examined for the sensitivity to hydrostatic pressure of the globular (G) to filamentous (F) self-assembly reaction. Both the equilibrium position and the kinetics of self-assembly were affected by pressure. Increased pressure shifted the self-assembly equilibrium toward the monomer (G) state and reduced the rate of F-actin assembly. For most of the actins studied, the perturbation by pressure of F-actin formation decreased with increasing measurement of pressure, indicating that F-actin has a higher compressibility than G-actin. The increase in system volume and compressibility concomitant with the assembly of F-actin can be interpreted as reflections of the major role played by hydrophobic effects in stabilizing F-actin and of the existence of "hard" binding sites, in the terminology of Torgerson et al. [Torgerson, P. M., Drickamer, H. G., & Weber, G. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 3079-3083], in the actin subunits. For actin from the deepest occurring species studied, the teleost fish Coryphaenoides armatus, which occurs to depths of approximately 5000 m (equivalent to 501 atm of pressure), there was no difference in compressibility between G-actin and F-actin; that is, the effect of increasing pressure on self-assembly was linear over the entire pressure range examined, 600 atm. The self-assembly reaction of the actin from C. armatus also differed from that of the other actins examined in that the G to F equilibrium was relatively insensitive to increased pressure; i.e., the volume change (delta V) of assembly was small.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3994993     DOI: 10.1021/bi00325a007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Piezotolerance of the cytoskeletal structure in cultured deep-sea fish cells using DNA transfection and protein introduction techniques.

Authors:  Sumihiro Koyama; Masuo Aizawa
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Thermodynamic and structural analysis of microtubule assembly: the role of GTP hydrolysis.

Authors:  B Vulevic; J J Correia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Exploring the stability limits of actin and its suprastructures.

Authors:  Christopher Rosin; Mirko Erlkamp; Julian von der Ecken; Stefan Raunser; Roland Winter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Effects of the piezo-tolerance of cultured deep-sea eel cells on survival rates, cell proliferation, and cytoskeletal structures.

Authors:  Sumihiro Koyama; Hiromi Kobayashi; Akira Inoue; Tetsuya Miwa; Masuo Aizawa
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Changes in molar volume and heat capacity of actin upon polymerization.

Authors:  F Quirion; C Gicquaud
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  Biochemical ecology of deep-sea animals.

Authors:  G N Somero
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-06-15

Review 7.  Explaining bathymetric diversity patterns in marine benthic invertebrates and demersal fishes: physiological contributions to adaptation of life at depth.

Authors:  Alastair Brown; Sven Thatje
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-10-04

8.  Combing Transcriptomes for Secrets of Deep-Sea Survival: Environmental Diversity Drives Patterns of Protein Evolution.

Authors:  J R Winnikoff; W R Francis; E V Thuesen; S H D Haddock
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  A novel live-cell imaging system reveals a reversible hydrostatic pressure impact on cell-cycle progression.

Authors:  Holly R Brooker; Irene A Gyamfi; Agnieszka Wieckowska; Nicholas J Brooks; Daniel P Mulvihill; Michael A Geeves
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.