Literature DB >> 3994504

Volunteer bias in erotica research: effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.

S A Wolchik, S L Braver, K Jensen.   

Abstract

Volunteer characteristics and volunteer rates across several laboratory experiments of sexual arousal were compared. Conditions were created to assess which component of the experimental setting was responsible for low volunteer rates in experiments using genital measurement. Subjects were 324 male and 424 female undergraduate students who had volunteered for an experiment on sexuality and personality. After completing several measures of sexual experience and attitude, subjects received a written description of one of the following conditions and were asked if they wished to volunteer: sexual film, sexual film and subjective rating of arousal, sexual film and assessment through forehead temperature, sexual film and assessment with a device that was placed over the clothes and measured genital heat flow, sexual film and assessment with the heat flow device while partially undressed, or sexual film and assessment with the vaginal photoplethysmograph or penile strain gauge while partially undressed. Men were significantly more likely to volunteer than women, and volunteer rates for both men and women decreased significantly when and only when subjects were required to undress. Multivariate analyses of variance revealed that both male and female volunteers were more sexually experienced, reported more exposure to erotic materials, and worried less about their sexual performance than nonvolunteers. No differences in volunteer characteristics occurred across the increasingly intrusive conditions for women while a few differences occurred for men. The present findings suggest that researchers should be cautious about discussing the generality of findings of studies involving exposure to a sexually explicit film alone as well as of experiments that involve self-report or physiological measures of sexual arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3994504     DOI: 10.1007/bf01541656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  10 in total

1.  Male-female differences in sexual arousal and behavior during and after exposure to sexually explicit stimuli.

Authors:  G Schmidt
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1975-07

2.  A vaginal plethysmograph system.

Authors:  G Sintchak; J H Geer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.

Authors:  W J Barker; D Perlman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1975-03

4.  A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.

Authors:  D H Barlow; R Becker; H Leitenberg; W S Agras
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970

5.  Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1968-02

6.  Heterosexual behavior assessment. I. Males.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1968-02

7.  A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.

Authors:  J R Heiman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal.

Authors:  S A Wolchik; S L Spencer; I S Lisi
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1983-10

9.  Thermographic measurement of sexual arousal: a discriminant validity analysis.

Authors:  P R Abramson; L B Perry; T T Seeley; D M Seeley; A B Rothblatt
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1981-04

10.  Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.

Authors:  G M Farkas; L F Sine; I M Evans
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1978-11
  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males.

Authors:  A F Bogaert
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1996-04

2.  Attitudinal and experiential correlates of anorgasmia.

Authors:  M P Kelly; D S Strassberg; J R Kircher
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1990-04

3.  Volunteer bias in sexuality research.

Authors:  D S Strassberg; K Lowe
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-08

4.  Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a "normal" sample of young men.

Authors:  T L Templeman; R D Stinnett
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1991-04

5.  Self-report assessment of female sexual function: psychometric evaluation of the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women.

Authors:  J F Taylor; R C Rosen; S R Leiblum
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-12

6.  Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior.

Authors:  T D Nirenberg; J P Wincze; S Bansal; M R Liepman; M Engle-Friedman; A Begin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1991-08

7.  The effect of question preface on response rates to a telephone survey of sexual experience.

Authors:  M W Wiederman; D L Weis; E R Allgeier
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-04

8.  Women's sexual and emotional responses to male- and female-produced erotica.

Authors:  E Laan; W Everaerd; G van Bellen; G Hanewald
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-04

Review 9.  Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Michael C Seto; Martin L Lalumière; Ellen Laan; Teresa Grimbos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-01-05

10.  The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns.

Authors:  Gerulf Rieger; Ritch C Savin-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.