Literature DB >> 399245

[Bacteriological in vitro investigations with cefaclor. Correlation of inhibition zone diameter and minimal inhibitory concentration (author's transl)].

H Grimm.   

Abstract

A comparison of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cefaclor and cephalexin shows that cefaclor is noticeably superior against Citrobacter. Enterobacter and Proteus mirabilis. Only slight differences are seen against other enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus. Both cefaclor and cephalexin are completely ineffective against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Regression analysis to correlate the inhibition zone diameter and MIC of cefaclor produced a very good correlation (r = -0.9741). Using 30 mcg discs on DST agar, inhibition zones of more than 20 mm are to be interpreted as "sensitivity" and zones of less than 13 mm as "resistance".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 399245     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  3 in total

1.  [Antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of eleven oral cephalosporins].

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; R Jungwirth; S Schweighart; M Theopold
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  In vitro activity of Ro 15-8074 and Ro 19-5247 in comparison to cefaclor and cefalexin.

Authors:  C Simon
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; R Jungwirth
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.