Literature DB >> 3990262

Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.

R C Beattie, M J Raffin.   

Abstract

The Auditec recordings of the CID W-22 monosyllables were used to generate test and retest intelligibility functions on normally hearing listeners and subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The normally hearing subjects were tested with 50-word lists at SPLs ranging from 15 to 50 dB. Lists of 25 words were used with the hearing-impaired group. The functions were analyzed to assess the reliability of threshold (50% point), slope (20%-80% points), and maximum intelligibility (PB max). The 50% point was obtained at 28 dB SPL for the normally hearing listeners and at a sensation level (SL) of 12 dB respondaic thresholds for the hearing-impaired group. Very stable monosyllabic thresholds were found because 95% of the test-retest values were within 6 dB for both subject groups. Slopes of 4.9% per dB and 2.7% per dB were obtained for the normally hearing and hearing-impaired groups, respectively. Fair reliability was observed; 95% of the test-retest values encompassed a range of +/- 1.9% per dB for the normally hearing subjects and +/- 1.1% per dB for the hearing-impaired group. Although group slopes provide useful information for selecting the range and step size for generating psychometric functions, the value of routinely obtaining slope on an individual basis has not been demonstrated. Even though the same word lists were used for both test and retest measurements, reliability closely agreed with predicted results based on the binomial theorem. In contrast to the large variability for a single list of 25 words, very stable PB max scores were found when two or three scores were averaged on the plateau of the function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3990262     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5002.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  4 in total

1.  Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William B Clinkscales; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.

Authors:  Lesli A Guthrie; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 3.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Audiovisual speech perception at various presentation levels in Mandarin-speaking adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Liu; Grace Yu; Li-Ang Lee; Tien-Chen Liu; Yung-Ting Tsou; Te-Jen Lai; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.