Literature DB >> 3989111

Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.

S Hawkins, K N Stevens.   

Abstract

For each of five vowels [i e a o u] following [t], a continuum from non-nasal to nasal was synthesized. Nasalization was introduced by inserting a pole-zero pair in the vicinity of the first formant in an all-pole transfer function. The frequencies and spacing of the pole and zero were systematically varied to change the degree of nasalization. The selection of stimulus parameters was determined from acoustic theory and the results of pilot experiments. The stimuli were presented for identification and discrimination to listeners whose language included a non-nasal--nasal vowel opposition (Gujarati, Hindi, and Bengali) and to American listeners. There were no significant differences between language groups in the 50% crossover points of the identification functions. Some vowels were more influenced by range and context effects than were others. The language groups showed some differences in the shape of the discrimination functions for some vowels. On the basis of the results, it is postulated that (1) there is a basic acoustic property of nasality, independent of the vowel, to which the auditory system responds in a distinctive way regardless of language background; and (2) there are one or more additional acoustic properties that may be used to various degrees in different languages to enhance the contrast between a nasal vowel and its non-nasal congener. A proposed candidate for the basic acoustic property is a measure of the degree of prominence of the spectral peak in the vicinity of the first formant. Additional secondary properties include shifts in the center of gravity of the low-frequency spectral prominence, leading to a change in perceived vowel height, and changes in overall spectral balance.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3989111     DOI: 10.1121/1.391999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Robust Estimation of Hypernasality in Dysarthria with Acoustic Model Likelihood Features.

Authors:  Michael Saxon; Ayush Tripathi; Yishan Jiao; Julie Liss; Visar Berisha
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-08-07

2.  Separating the redundancy of voicing from nasality in American English.

Authors:  J M Stewart; C M Barach
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1987-01

3.  Co-Occurrence of Hypernasality and Voice Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Acoustic Quantification.

Authors:  Marziye Eshghi; Kathryn P Connaghan; Sarah E Gutz; James D Berry; Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Effects of spectral content on Horii Oral-Nasal Coupling scores in children.

Authors:  Lenny A Varghese; Joseph O Mendoza; Maia N Braden; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Static measurements of vowel formant frequencies and bandwidths: A review.

Authors:  Raymond D Kent; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Are Acoustic Markers of Voice and Speech Signals Affected by Nose-and-Mouth-Covering Respiratory Protective Masks?

Authors:  Youri Maryn; Floris L Wuyts; Andrzej Zarowski
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Evaluation of noise excitation as a method for detection of hypernasality.

Authors:  Kat Young; Triona Sweeney; Rebecca R Vos; Felicity Mehendale; Helena Daffern
Journal:  Appl Acoust       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.