Literature DB >> 3987991

An up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity testing.

R D Bruce.   

Abstract

An up-and down method for acute toxicity (LD50) testing has been developed and statistically evaluated. Compared with the "classical" procedure, this method permits a major reduction in the number of animals used. In the up-and-down procedure, animals are dosed one at a time. If an animal survives, the dose for the next animal is increased; if it dies, the dose is decreased. A survey of 48 acute toxicity tests in rats showed that the great majority of the animals that ultimately died did so within 1 or 2 days. Because of this, it suffices to observe each animal for 1 or 2 days before dosing the next animal. It is recommended, however, that surviving animals be monitored for delayed death for a total of 7 days. The procedure for estimating the LD50 takes into account all deaths, and may be performed using widely available computer program packages. Testing in females alone is recommended, based on the observation that they were generally more sensitive in the survey of 48 studies; selective follow-up in males may sometimes be indicated. The procedure has been tested, by simulation, on 10 of the survey studies. It produced excellent agreement with the original studies. The 95% confidence interval for the LD50 averaged +/- 32% by the up-and-down method, compared with +/- 15% for conventional studies using 40 to 50 animals. The up-and-down procedure will require only 6 to 10 animals, provided that the initial estimate of the LD50 is within a factor of 2 of the true LD50. The method cannot be recommended for testing materials where deaths beyond 2 days postdosing are the rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3987991     DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(85)90059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0272-0590


  52 in total

Review 1.  A national validation study of the acute-toxic-class method--an alternative to the LD50 test.

Authors:  E Schlede; U Mischke; R Roll; D Kayser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Acute and subchronic toxicity as well as evaluation of safety pharmacology of eucalyptus oil-water emulsions.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Hu; Ruizhang Feng; Fa Xiang; Xu Song; Zhongqiong Yin; Chao Zhang; Xinghong Zhao; Renyong Jia; Zhenzhen Chen; Li Li; Lizi Yin; Xiaoxia Liang; Changliang He; Gang Shu; Cheng Lv; Ling Zhao; Gang Ye; Fei Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  A simple method for screening assessment of acute toxicity of chemicals.

Authors:  S Yamanaka; M Hashimoto; M Tobe; K Kobayashi; J Sekizawa; M Nishimura
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  Invited contribution: acute toxicity testing, public responsibility and scientific challenges.

Authors:  G Zbinden
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.691

5.  Confidence limit calculation for antidotal potency ratio derived from lethal dose 50.

Authors:  Ananda Manage; Ilona Petrikovics
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2013-03-26

6.  Both epsilon-toxin and beta-toxin are important for the lethal properties of Clostridium perfringens type B isolates in the mouse intravenous injection model.

Authors:  Mariano E Fernandez-Miyakawa; Derek J Fisher; Rachael Poon; Sameera Sayeed; Vicki Adams; Julian I Rood; Bruce A McClane; Francisco A Uzal
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  An accurate method for estimating an approximate lethal dose with few animals, tested with a Monte Carlo procedure.

Authors:  A J van Noordwijk; J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  The international validation study of the acute toxic class method (oral).

Authors:  E Schlede; U Mischke; W Diener; D Kayser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Potential citric acid exposure and toxicity to Hawaiian hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) associated with Eleutherodactylus frog control.

Authors:  William C Pitt; Gary W Witmer; Susan M Jojola; Hans Sin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Toxic effects and excretion in urine of 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX) in the after a single oral dose.

Authors:  H Komulainen; H Huuskonen; V M Kosma; S Lötjönen; T Vartiainen
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.