Literature DB >> 3981573

Objections to hospital philosophers.

W Ruddick, W Finn.   

Abstract

Like morally sensitive hospital staff, philosophers resist routine simplification of morally complex cases. Like hospital clergy, they favour reflective and principled decision-making. Like hospital lawyers, they refine and extend the language we use to formulate and defend our complex decisions. But hospital philosophers are not redundant: they have a wider range of principles and categories and a sharper eye for self-serving presuppositions and implicit contradictions within our practices. As semi-outsiders, they are often best able to take an 'external point of view,' unburdened by routine, details, and departmental loyalties. Their clarifications can temporarily disrupt routine, but can eventually improve staff morale, hence team practice and patient welfare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3981573      PMCID: PMC1375131          DOI: 10.1136/jme.11.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Medical ethics: some reservations.

Authors:  J D Swales
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  In defence of clinical bioethics.

Authors:  J D Arras; T H Murray
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The philosopher in the health care setting: objections and replies.

Authors:  C D Melley
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.