Literature DB >> 398027

Liver transplantation: the pathologist's perspective.

R H Fennell, H J Roddy.   

Abstract

In the years 1963--1977, the pathology department of the University of Colorado Medical School did 93 autopsies of patients with liver transplants. Fifteen of these patients had received a second graft. Sepsis was the greatest single cause of death or failure, and fungi and other organisms often considered opportunistic were frequent pathogens. Problems relating to removal of the liver from the donor, emplacement of the graft in the new host, and maintenance of the graft during the prolonged procedures together offer a monstrous challenge to the transplantation surgeon. All of these problems, classed as technical, include as complications infarction of the graft as the result of prolonged ischemia and blood loss or shock due to various causes, and all may produce alteration in structure of the liver; such changes may be misinterpreted as rejection. Rejection was a major cause of failure in only 5 patients, although the immunosuppression employed to control it contributed to the sepsis that so often was lethal. Hyperacute rejection was not observed in any of these transplanted livers, although 15 of these patients received a second transplant. Two of the patients whose grafts failed due to rejection had changes that indicated progression to an early stage of cirrhosis. We conclude that despite the persistent problems the liver is an organ peculiarly favorable for transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 398027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Annu        ISSN: 0079-0184


  12 in total

1.  Hepatic Homograft Survival in Pediatric Orthotopic Liver Transplantation with Cyclosporine and Steroids.

Authors:  B J Zitelli; J C Gartner; J J Malatack; B W Shaw; S Iwatsuki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Liver transplant rejection arteritis: serial hepatic arteriography.

Authors:  S S Morse; A Reuben; E B Strauss; L H Greenwood; D F Denny; D August; M W Flye
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Radiographic features of liver allograft rejection.

Authors:  R Dominguez; V Cuervas-Mons; D H Van Thiel; J W Lecky; T E Starzl
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

4.  Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft.

Authors:  S G Hubscher; D Clements; E Elias; P McMaster
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Pediatric liver transplantation. Part II. Diagnostic imaging in postoperative management.

Authors:  R Dominguez; L W Young; J Ledesma-Medina; J Cienfuegos; J C Gartner; K M Bron; T E Starzl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Histopathology of serial graft biopsies from liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  H F Eggink; N Hofstee; C H Gips; R A Krom; H J Houthoff
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Liver transplantation.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1983-10

Review 8.  Evolution of liver transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Iwatsuki; D H Van Thiel; J C Gartner; B J Zitelli; J J Malatack; R R Schade; B W Shaw; T R Hakala; J T Rosenthal; K A Porter
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Bacterial infections after liver transplantation.

Authors:  C V Paya; P E Hermans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Liver transplantation: where it's been and where it's going.

Authors:  D H Van Thiel; L Makowka; T E Starzl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.