Literature DB >> 3980173

The value of searching films without specific preconceptions.

R G Swensson, S J Hessel, P G Herman.   

Abstract

The detection of simulated pulmonary nodules was measured in three different situations that required: (1) reports of all significant chest findings (Free Search), (2) only reports of possible nodules (Nodule Search), or (3) evaluation of particular film locations as nodules (Specified Location). ROC curves from these conditions compared how accurately readers could distinguish between the nodule and normal "test locations," and between the films that did and did not contain nodules. In replication of previous results for heterogeneous chest findings, detection accuracy was superior when readers had to search the films. Each reader's distinctions between the nodule and normal test locations became considerably less accurate when these locations were prespecified for explicit evaluation. When asked to search only for pulmonary nodules, most readers substantially increased their false reports of nodules at each level of confidence, with little improvement in their (already high) true-detection rates. Searching for nodules increased both the true-detection and false-detection rates for two readers, who simply appeared to relax a strong bias against reporting nodules in the initial Free-Search situation.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3980173     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198501000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Susan Mallett; Stuart A Taylor; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Impact of a clinical scenario on accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation.

Authors:  R Hatala; G R Norman; L R Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Reporting instructions significantly impact false positive rates when reading chest radiographs.

Authors:  John W Robinson; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Sarah J Lewis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Does Expectation of Abnormality Affect the Search Pattern of Radiologists When Looking for Pulmonary Nodules?

Authors:  Stephen Littlefair; Patrick Brennan; Warren Reed; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.

Authors:  K M Schartz; K S Berbaum; M T Madsen; B H Thompson; B F Mullan; R T Caldwell; B Hammett; A N Ellingson; E A Franken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.

Authors:  K M Schartz; K S Berbaum; M T Madsen; B H Thompson; B F Mullan; R T Caldwell; B Hammett; A N Ellingson; E A Franken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Diagnosis of IPA in HIV: the role of the chest X-ray and radiologist.

Authors:  Uta Zaspel; David W Denning; Arne J Lemke; Reginald Greene; Dirk Schürmann; Georg Maschmeyer; Markus Ruhnke; Raoul Herbrecht; Patricia Ribaud; Olivier Lortholary; Harmien Zonderland; Klaus F Rabe; Rainer Röttgen; Roland Bittner; Klaus Neumann; Joerg W Oestmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  The Holistic Processing Account of Visual Expertise in Medical Image Perception: A Review.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.