Literature DB >> 3978620

Differential sensitivity of human breast cancer cell lines to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen.

R R Reddel, L C Murphy, R E Hall, R L Sutherland.   

Abstract

In eight estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cell lines (including three sublines of MCF-7) and five ER-negative breast lines, the action of the nonsteroidal antiestrogen, tamoxifen, was studied, and the concentrations of ER and antiestrogen binding site were measured. The concentration of antiestrogen binding site was significantly [P less than 0.005] greater in ER-positive cells [236,600 +/- 29,900 (SE) sites/cell] than in ER-negative cell lines [66,600 +/- 16,800 sites/cell]. In ER-positive cell lines, a cell cycle phase-specific growth-inhibitory effect, 20% inhibitory dose less than 0.1 to 1.0 microM, was seen which was shown for some representative cell lines to be estrogen reversible. Within this group of cell lines, the degree of tamoxifen-induced inhibition of growth correlated with control population doubling time, but not ER or antiestrogen binding site concentration. The changes in cell cycle kinetic parameters characteristic of all ER-positive lines were a decrease in percentage of S-phase cells and a corresponding increase in percentage of G0-G1 cells. In all cell lines, 5 to 12.5 microM tamoxifen caused cytotoxicity, and this was shown to be estrogen-irreversible in 3 representative cell lines; moreover, estradiol synergistically enhanced the cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen under some experimental conditions. The cell cycle effects of tamoxifen in three ER-negative cell lines (Hs0578T, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-330) were decreased proportions of G0-G1 cells with an increase in percentages of S and G2+M cells. These results implied that the mechanism of tamoxifen cytotoxicity may differ in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells. However, although the ER-negative BT-20 line was much less sensitive to tamoxifen than were the ER-positive cells, growth inhibition and cytotoxicity in this line were associated with a slight decrease in percentage of S-phase cells. These results confirm that ER-positive breast cancer cells are more sensitive (4- to greater than 75-fold) than ER-negative breast cells to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen and demonstrate that, in all ER-positive cells, growth inhibition and cytotoxicity are accompanied by characteristic changes in cell cycle kinetic parameters. In contrast, different mechanisms may be involved in the effects of tamoxifen on different ER-negative cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3978620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  37 in total

1.  Conventional Dose CAF Therapy versus Low Dose Adriamycin Therapy in the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-07-30       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Down-regulation of androgen receptor by progestins and interference with estrogenic or androgenic stimulation of mammary carcinoma cell growth.

Authors:  R Hackenberg; J Hofmann; G Wolff; F Hölzel; K D Schulz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Combined effects of epirubicin and tamoxifen on the cell-cycle phases in estrogen-receptor-negative Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

Authors:  A Aydiner; M Ridvanogullari; D Anil; E Topuz; R Nurten; R Disci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Time resolved gene expression analysis during tamoxifen adaption of MCF-7 cells identifies long non-coding RNAs with prognostic impact.

Authors:  Martin Porsch; Esra Özdemir; Martin Wisniewski; Sebastian Graf; Fabian Bull; Katrin Hoffmann; Atanas Ignatov; Johannes Haybaeck; Ivo Grosse; Thomas Kalinski; Norbert Nass
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  From bench to bedside: What do we know about hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer?

Authors:  Victoria Shang Wu; Noriko Kanaya; Chiao Lo; Joanne Mortimer; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.292

6.  Biological differences among MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines from different laboratories.

Authors:  C K Osborne; K Hobbs; J M Trent
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Effects of tamoxifen on growth and apoptosis of estrogen-dependent and -independent human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  R R Perry; Y Kang; B Greaves
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Tamoxifen. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.

Authors:  M M Buckley; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Ligand Conjugates Incorporating Endoxifen-Combretastatin and Cyclofenil-Combretastatin Hybrid Scaffolds: Synthesis and Biochemical Evaluation.

Authors:  Patrick M Kelly; Niall O Keely; Sandra A Bright; Bassem Yassin; Gloria Ana; Darren Fayne; Daniela M Zisterer; Mary J Meegan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Non-myelotoxic antitumour effects of L-dopa, buthionine sulphoximine and tamoxifen on neuroblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  E Busse; O Bartsch; B Kornhuber
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.