Literature DB >> 3978419

Nucleus basalis neurons exhibit axonal branching with decreased impulse conduction velocity in rat cerebrocortex.

G Aston-Jones, R Shaver, T G Dinan.   

Abstract

Single neurons in the basal forebrain (nucleus basalis area) were antidromically activated from the frontal or parietal cortex in anesthetized rats. Wide ranges of antidromic latencies were observed overall, with frontal and parietal stimulation yielding values ranging from 1.0 to 26.0 ms and 1.6-24.0 ms, respectively. Individual neurons often exhibited multiple antidromic latencies, such that deeper sites of stimulation or greater stimulation amplitudes generally yielded discretely different, shorter latencies than more superficial sites or lower amplitudes of stimulation. Single neurons were also often driven from neighboring sites (1-2 mm apart) within the frontal cortex, but no cell was coactivated from both frontal and parietal cortices. Finally, patterns and rates of spontaneous activity varied markedly among these cortically projecting neurons, with some cells being non-spontaneous and others exhibiting tonic rates of 30-40 Hz. Impulse waveforms also differed among driven cells, from relatively low-amplitude, negative spikes to large-amplitude, entirely positive spikes in unfiltered signals. These results indicate that cortically projecting, putatively cholinergic neurons in the basal fore-brain form a physiologically heterogeneous population in terms of impulse conduction velocity, spontaneous discharge, and spike waveforms. Our finding of multiple antidromic latencies and driving from neighboring sites indicate that these fibers may be highly branched in local terminal fields, but that individual cells may project exclusively to a single cortical area. Faster conduction velocities for deep compared to superficial cortical stimulation sites imply that these fibers may become non-myelinated upon entering cortical terminal fields, or that they may become markedly thinner as they travel within the cortex. This system of cholinergic cortical afferents differs in many physiologic aspects from the other non-thalamic cortical input systems of catecholamine or indoleamine neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3978419     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90323-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cholinergic circuitry of the human nucleus basalis and its fate in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Electrophysiological and anatomical observations concerning the pallidostriatal pathway in the rat.

Authors:  R H Walker; G W Arbuthnott; A K Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Removal of cholinergic input to rat posterior parietal cortex disrupts incremental processing of conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Some in vivo electrophysiological properties of locus coeruleus neurones in fetal rats.

Authors:  T Sakaguchi; S Nakamura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A frontal cortex event-related potential driven by the basal forebrain.

Authors:  David P Nguyen; Shih-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Distinct neuronal populations in the basal forebrain encode motivational salience and movement.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Shih-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Integration of inhibitory and excitatory effects of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation in the prelimbic cortex regulates network activity and plasticity.

Authors:  Matthew Udakis; Victoria Louise Wright; Susan Wonnacott; Christopher Philip Bailey
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 8.  Basal forebrain motivational salience signal enhances cortical processing and decision speed.

Authors:  Sylvina M Raver; Shih-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.