Literature DB >> 3978364

Methods of X-ray assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a re-evaluation.

D L Scott, B L Coulton, P A Bacon, A J Popert.   

Abstract

We have re-examined the value of hand radiographs in the assessment of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis in a series of related studies. Our objectives were: to assess the reproducibility of scoring hand radiographs and the relationships between different types of changes; to analyse the correlations between radiographic changes and hand function; and to assess the inter-relation between hand changes and overall joint damage. We confirmed the reproducibility of radiological assessments and showed that two observers can reproducibly score hand radiographs separately for joint space loss and erosions; both of these correlated with the Larsen score derived from standard radiographs. However, hand radiographic changes were not closely related to hand function; nor did they predict damage to large joints. Finally, examination of changes in 13 joint groups showed that there is a weak relationship between damage and disease duration, and the rate of damage is greatest in the initial years. We conclude that the status of hand radiography as a measure of overall outcome in rheumatoid arthritis remains an open question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3978364     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/24.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  10 in total

1.  Increased type I collagen degradation is associated with a need for total joint replacement surgery in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S Aman; M Hakala; L Risteli; J Risteli
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Radiological evaluation of erosions: a quantitative method for assessing long-term remittive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W M O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  What happens to patients with rheumatoid arthritis? The long-term outcome of treatment.

Authors:  T D Spector; D L Scott
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Assessing the progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; M Farr
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Prediction of radiographic damage in hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis by clinical evaluation.

Authors:  M J Plant; J Saklatvala; P W Jones; P T Dawes
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Prognostic markers in rheumatoid arthritis and classification of antirheumatic therapies.

Authors:  E H Choy; D L Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.

Authors:  S Boini; F Guillemin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Progressive joint damage during penicillamine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; A Greenwood; R Bryans; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Bone loss. Quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; H K Genant
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-03

10.  Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?

Authors:  Theresa Kapral; Florian Dernoschnig; Klaus P Machold; Tanja Stamm; Monika Schoels; Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.