Literature DB >> 3977693

Effectiveness of a pinhole method for visual acuity screening.

J I Loewenstein, P F Palmberg, J E Connett, D N Wentworth.   

Abstract

Visual acuity screening was performed in the home in an adult population, using a standardized, retroilluminated chart. A pinhole disk was utilized to retest those subjects who initially failed the screening. All subjects failing the screening with the pinholes, and an equal number of age-matched subjects passing the screening (controls), were asked to have a complete ophthalmologic examination, including a protocol refraction in an eye clinic (clinic examination). Without use of the pinhole disk, 14.4% of subjects failed to read a 20/40 line. Use of the pinholes reduced the failure rate to 6.9%. Fifty-seven percent of those failing and 55% of controls had the clinic examination. Determination of best-corrected visual acuity after protocol refraction in the clinic indicated that the false-positive rate (the percentage of subjects who failed the screening but had visual acuity of 20/40 or better on the clinic examination) for the screening was 26%, and the false-negative rate (the percentage of subjects who passed the screening but had visual acuity of worse than 20/40 on the clinic examination) was 1.5%. Use of a pinhole disk is highly effective for visual acuity screening, reducing the false-positive rate by more than half.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977693     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050020074024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  10 in total

1.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 3. Screening for visual problems among elderly patients. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  'Correctable undetected visual acuity deficit' in patients aged 65 and over attending an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  D Z Reinstein; N L Dorward; R P Wormald; A Graham; I O'Connor; R M Charlton; M Yeatman; R Dodenhoff; R Touquet; T Challoner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Visual acuity testing using autorefraction or pinhole occluder compared with a manual protocol refraction in individuals with diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer K Sun; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Jerry D Cavallerano; Margaret Stockman; Kellee M Miller; Haijing Qin; Roy W Beck; Adam R Glassman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Results of the Pinhole Test Correlate with Hybrid Contact Lens Visual Acuity in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Corneal Diseases.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Screening older people for impaired vision in primary care: cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Liam Smeeth; Astrid E Fletcher; Smita Hanciles; Jennifer Evans; Richard Wormald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

7.  Validation of Simplified Visual Acuity Testing Protocols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Lindsay C Boven; Qin Li Jiang; Heather E Moss
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-04-27

8.  Vision and Visual History in Elite/Near-Elite-Level Cricketers and Rugby-League Players.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Jonathan C Flavell; Simon J Bennett; Alice G Cruickshank; Alex Mankowska; Julie M Harris; John G Buckley
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-11-10

9.  Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sethu Sheeladevi; Bharani Seelam; Phanindra B Nukella; Rishi R Borah; Rahul Ali; Lisa Keay
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Effective refractive error coverage: an eye health indicator to measure progress towards universal health coverage.

Authors:  Ian McCormick; Islay Mactaggart; Andrew Bastawrous; Matthew J Burton; Jacqueline Ramke
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.117

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.