Literature DB >> 3977587

Severity of illness in intra-abdominal infection. A comparison of two indexes.

T Skau, P O Nyström, C Carlsson.   

Abstract

The severity of illness in 58 surgical patients with high-grade intra-abdominal infection was measured with two methods, an acute physiology score and a septic severity score. Both methods are the summed weight of derangements in physiologic factors representing the function of the major organ systems of the body. Sixteen patients died (28%). Score values with both methods were significantly higher for nonsurvivors than for survivors. There was good interrelation between the methods, and the scores correlated better with mortality than did age, chronic disease, anatomy, or cause. Three risk levels were recognized, low, high, and intermediate, with respective mortality rates of less than 10%, greater than 80%, and approximately 45%. Three-fourths of the patients were assigned to the same risk group with both methods. The severity of illness in patients with intra-abdominal infection can suitably be measured with both methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977587     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390260022004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  9 in total

1.  Staged abdominal repair for treatment of moderate to severe secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  Fatih Agalar; Erol Eroglu; Mahmut Bulbul; Canan Agalar; Omar Ridvan Tarhan; Mustafa Sari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Phospholipase A--a parameter of sepsis? A comparison of PLA and Stevens' Sepsis Severity Score.

Authors:  A Schild; E Pscheidl; U V Hintzenstern
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1989-02-01

3.  [The value of clinical parameters for determining the prognosis of peritonitis--validation of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index].

Authors:  N Demmel; K Maag; G Osterholzer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

Review 4.  Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. Joint Working Party of SIS North America and Europe.

Authors:  P O Nyström; R Bax; E P Dellinger; L Dominioni; W A Knaus; J L Meakins; C Ohmann; J S Solomkin; H Wacha; D H Wittmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Are there patients with peritonitis who require empiric therapy for enterococcus?

Authors:  S Harbarth; I Uckay
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Severity and predicted outcome of postoperative Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Authors:  T Kodama; T Yokoyama; Y Takesue; M Okita; A Nakamitsu; E Hiyama; Y Imamura; T Santo; Y Murakami; H Tsumura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  [Bacterial peritonitis].

Authors:  F W Eigler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1986

8.  Intraabdominal infections: classification, mortality, scoring and pathophysiology.

Authors:  R G Holzheimer; K H Muhrer; N L'Allemand; T Schmidt; K Henneking
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  High phosphoserine in sepsis: panel of clinical and plasma amino acid correlations.

Authors:  Carlo Chiarla; Ivo Giovannini; John H Siegel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-06-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.